I've read a bit about space-based solar power. It would be sent to earth by either laser or microwave. Could it not also be reversed and have energy sent from earth to satelites in LEO, where they use that power to transfer to GSO and other places in the solar system. It seems to me to be a hell of a lot cheaper than carrying all that fuel with them

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Even better, we could gather a giant ball of hydrogen and initiate a gravitationally stabilized fusion reaction, then harness the mostly visible-spectrum radiation it emits and convert it into electricity using solar cells. This is a hell of a lot cheaper than beaming energy up to spacecraft with lasers. $\endgroup$
    – Adam Wuerl
    Jun 19, 2015 at 5:08

1 Answer 1


It's not enough to just have power, you also need reaction mass to move a spacecraft (see, for instance, ion engine). The spacecraft would still need to carry the gas (or other propellant with it); the only exception is if you use a solar sail and shine a laser from Earth onto it.

Beaming power to a spacecraft could work (the Wikipedia article goes into some detail), but there are a number of practical problems which remain unsolved. Among them:

  • The Earth is permanently rotating; you would need a number of "beaming" stations around the planet to constantly power a spacecraft.
  • The machinery on board the spacecraft to convert the beamed power into electricity weighs; the question is, does it weigh less than solar panels?
  • Beamed power attenuates fairly strongly through the atmosphere, and diffuses with distance. So you lose a fair chunk of power by beaming it through the atmosphere, and the further the spacecraft is away, the less power it will receive.

So: in theory it's possible, but there are a number of obstacles to be overcome first, and given our current level of technology it's not worth doing.

  • $\begingroup$ Re "the only exception", if you had a sufficiently powerful laser on a spacecraft, would not the photon pressure from that accelerate the craft? As the inverse of a solar sail... $\endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    Jun 18, 2015 at 17:48
  • $\begingroup$ Photon pressure is pretty small and the Shuttle has a slight orbital decay anyway cause it orbits within the outer edges of our atmosphere. That likely wouldn't be a problem. $\endgroup$
    – userLTK
    Jun 18, 2015 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ @jamesqf Photon pressure only gets you about 20µN per watt of laser output. $\endgroup$
    – Philipp
    Jun 19, 2015 at 14:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Philipp: Sure, I never claimed that it'd be efficient, just that it might work in principle as a drive that doesn't need any reaction mass, if you have a lot of energy available. E.g. something like str.llnl.gov/str/Petawatt.html running continuously off zero-pioint energy. $\endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    Jun 19, 2015 at 18:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.