1
$\begingroup$

I would like to know what is the modulation technique used on the New Horizons Spacecraft? Is it BPSK or GMSK? Also what is the coding technique-turbo-codes or LDPC codes? And do you have a link budget available?

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ 2 of your 3 questions are answered here: space.stackexchange.com/questions/7776/… $\endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    Jul 15, 2015 at 12:24
  • $\begingroup$ @Hobbes - the linked question does not directly deal with modulation, I'd be loath to close this one as a dupe. It is too broad, though. $\endgroup$ Jul 15, 2015 at 12:49
  • $\begingroup$ Irving, please choose one specific question instead of three, bearing in mind the link posted by @Hobbes. $\endgroup$ Jul 15, 2015 at 12:50
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Deer Hunter: Phil Karn's answer to that question contains the data Irving's looking for (BPSK and turbo-coding). $\endgroup$
    – Hobbes
    Jul 15, 2015 at 12:59

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Phil has explained it nicely. Yes, it is BPSK with R=1/6 Turbo coding, that is used in New Horizons. Some aspects of the X band digital receiver used is discussed here. For the coding enthusiasts, I can add that the Blocklength is k=1784 bits (even though it is programmable, for low data rate support, this minimum block length is used). The information code length (post coding) n =(k+4)/R=10728 bits.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Welcome to Space.SE. This is a very interesting information. However it covers the uplink receiver, not the downlink transmitter which is the topic in the question. Any chance you can get a similar paper? $\endgroup$
    – mins
    Jul 19, 2015 at 23:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The turbo coding is in fact for the downlink. The uplink is not coded. $\endgroup$
    – Mark Adler
    Jul 20, 2015 at 0:30
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the info. I thought Phil had mentioned the DL reference circuit link already. Yes I was referring to the DL (Turbo coding). That is where the most critical/precious data (e.g., image data) is coming. Also, the most sophisticated of the receivers (turbo decoder, synchronization to name a few) can be implemented in the ground than in the space station. $\endgroup$ Jul 20, 2015 at 2:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.