From the `Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System (TDRSS)` option on Celestrak's NORAD Two-Line Element Sets [Current Data TLE page][1] I've compiled current TLE inclinations for "on line" TDRS spacecraft: Spacecraft inc(degs) TDRS 3 14.4405 TDRS 5 14.5306 TDRS 6 14.0861 TDRS 7 15.0545 TDRS 8 7.9573 TDRS 9 5.8274 TDRS 10 5.5187 TDRS 11 5.0141 TDRS 12 5.6613 While not included (yet) on that page, according to this [answer][2] TDRS-13 has entered into service, and can still be found in Celestrak: TDRS 13 6.7494 While these satellites are in [geosynchronous orbits][4], they would not be considered [geostationary orbits][3]; their large inclinations result in [analemma][5]-shaped ground tracks, and the antennas of TDRS ground-segment stations would need to trace their daily, nearly North-South movement in order to remain in contact. This is probably not a big deal, considering the attention and resources already necessary to maintain this critical segment of so many ongoing missions. But I am curious about the inclinations themselves. There is a cluster (TDRS-3 through TDRS-7) between 14 and 15 degrees, and another (TDRS-9 through TDRS-13) between 5 and 6 degrees. The newest member TDRS-13 is and has been close to 7 degrees for a while now, and TDRS-8 is near 8 degrees. Are these inclinations specified, station-kept and optimial in some way, or do they reflect non-station-kept "inclination creep" that is a natural phenomenon for circular orbits at this distance, or is there another way to uderstand this distribution in TDRS inclinations? [![TDRS-13 ground track][13]][12] **above:** Screen shot of TDRS-13 analemma-shaped ground track from [N2Y0][14]. [1]: https://www.celestrak.com/NORAD/elements/ [2]: https://space.stackexchange.com/a/26268/12102 [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_orbit [4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geosynchronous_orbit [5]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analemma [12]: https://i.sstatic.net/4mJhZ.png [13]: https://i.sstatic.net/4mJhZm.png [14]: http://www.n2yo.com/?s=42915