28 votes

Would launching a shuttle from a 45 degree angle be the most fuel efficient for a rail gun?

Two issues: Any orbit achieved will (discounting perturbations) pass through the point at which it was last altered by some external force. In the case of your rail gun, if it's on the ground, any ...
Tristan's user avatar
  • 17.3k
18 votes

Would launching a shuttle from a 45 degree angle be the most fuel efficient for a rail gun?

To keep the acceleration manageable, you need a very long rail gun: say 8000 m/s of speed needed, 40 m/s2 acceleration (4G), that's 8000/40= 200 seconds of 'flight' on the rail. That's 800 km. That's ...
Hobbes's user avatar
  • 128k
10 votes

Would launching a shuttle from a 45 degree angle be the most fuel efficient for a rail gun?

45 degrees is probably not ideal. ...but it depends on your shuttle design. To get to orbit, you need to go fast, not high. It's hard to go fast at low altitudes though, because there is a lot of ...
fectin's user avatar
  • 1,009
10 votes
Accepted

Orbital Railgun for launching deep space probes

Concepts for mass-drivers or railguns situated on the moon exist. What you're asking about is a mass driver space station in low earth orbit that a payload or ship launched from earth can dock with, ...
Ingolifs's user avatar
  • 6,458
10 votes

Orbital Railgun for launching deep space probes

Let's look at some numbers. For the sake of argument let's target a delta-V from the railgun of 4 km/s enough to get to low lunar orbit or Mars transfer orbit. If the railgun is 1km long, that would ...
Steve Linton's user avatar
  • 19.6k
7 votes

Would launching a shuttle from a 45 degree angle be the most fuel efficient for a rail gun?

Ignoring the atmosphere, let's say you're launching from the moon, the best angle to launch at would be 0 degrees. This way you can accelerate to orbital speed at sea-level plus however much you need ...
Vincent B's user avatar
  • 386
5 votes

Is railgun propulsion being researched?

I suspect that if you have the electric power available to fire macroscopic projectiles from a railgun, you're better off accelerating Xenon gas with it. Current ion thrusters yield exhaust velocities ...
Russell Borogove's user avatar
5 votes
Accepted

Is railgun propulsion being researched?

Yes, Made on Space is researching a similar idea. Plan to Turn Asteroids Into Spaceships the propulsion system might be some sort of catapult that launches boulders or other material off the ...
MarsOneOrBust's user avatar
4 votes

Ideal shape for a long, skinny reaction mass for LEO to cis-lunar and beyond? (a "space rail gun")

I've answered some aspects of this, but considering a 1km railgun in my answer to the "parent" question. A much longer railgun doesn't make a lot of difference to the calculations there, except for ...
Steve Linton's user avatar
  • 19.6k
3 votes

Orbital Railgun for launching deep space probes

For the purpose of orbiting other planets; this solution adds lots of complexity, without (almost) any benefit. You still need propellant, both on the craft and the railgun The probe still need a ...
Antzi's user avatar
  • 12.6k
3 votes
Accepted

Electromagnetic accelerator in space

According to Newton, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. As the magnets were applied to the craft, it would apply as much force on the accelerator. The accelerator would have to ...
Ashlar's user avatar
  • 376
3 votes
Accepted

Can I push the atmosphere out of the way?

Some starting numbers here would be that the leading hypersonic projectile will be scooping up a cylinder of atmosphere equal to the frontal area and it's traveled path. The first approximation of the ...
GremlinWranger's user avatar
3 votes

Ideal shape for a long, skinny reaction mass for LEO to cis-lunar and beyond? (a "space rail gun")

Having asked and thought about a similar question, I think the answer is simple. Don't build accelerators for humans. Build them for cargo. The total mass of cargo that a human needs to be ...
Roko Mijic's user avatar
2 votes

What limits are put on mission profiles by maximum tolerated G-force?

The Moon escape velocity is 2380 m/s. For a constant acceleration, the needed distance and time are: ...
Uwe's user avatar
  • 49k
2 votes
Accepted

Can ISS trash be used as reaction mass for orbital maintenance

Guns would not be practical--you get more boost by simply bringing up rocket fuel than with gun propellant throwing trash. However, this does not preclude a mass driver approach. Break the trash into ...
Loren Pechtel's user avatar
2 votes

Can ISS trash be used as reaction mass for orbital maintenance

Yeeeeees, it can. For some very horrid variants of the word "can", which includes things like "Can students make a good bonfire? Yes they can, if you stack them high enough before ...
CuteKItty_pleaseStopBArking's user avatar
2 votes

Is railgun propulsion being researched?

From a science fiction perspective, there is a book Heart of the Comet by Gregory Benford and David Brin about an attempt to corral Halleys comet into Earth orbit. At apogee, they use mass-slingers, ...
geoffc's user avatar
  • 79.6k
2 votes

Is it possible to launch picosatellite into orbit from railgun on high-altitude plane?

Another problem that would rear it's ugly head if you were to try this: Wake turbulence. Your satellite will be leaving the barrel at a stupendous velocity. It's going to slam into the atmosphere ...
Loren Pechtel's user avatar
2 votes

Is it possible to launch picosatellite into orbit from railgun on high-altitude plane?

Is it possible? Yes, but not with current technology (sorry not sorry for that pun). Right now railguns can't shoot projectiles fast enough to launch picosats from altitude. At least that's what my ...
ViennaCodex's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

would launching from a vacuum tunnel in a mountain from a 45 degree angle be the best way to launch a space shuttle

Yes, No, Maybe. First, you have to define what is the "best way" Considering the technology for such a railgun is science fiction it's impossible to answer you without detailed parameters. Firsts ...
Antzi's user avatar
  • 12.6k
1 vote

Would launching a shuttle from a 45 degree angle be the most fuel efficient for a rail gun?

As many before me have commented, there is a trade-off between gaining altitude (for purposes of reducing drag and raising the highest possible perigee) and gaining horizontal speed (reducing ...
Sherman Flipse's user avatar
1 vote

Would launching a shuttle from a 45 degree angle be the most fuel efficient for a rail gun?

As others have mentioned, orbits pass through the last point where a force acted upon the body, so a 45 degree angle shot will (attempt) to pass back through the ground at the point of launch at the ...
bendl's user avatar
  • 294

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible