41

If you watch these videos: ATV boost Zvezda boost ...you can see that the acceleration is quite gentle, but definite. The astronauts do need to hang on to something if they don't want to drift to the back of whatever room they're in. The first video was a reboost performed with the ATV service ship, as described in this article. Depending on what ...


39

The answer to the question, "Do the astronauts feel the station moving?" is yes, definitely, but sometimes in an "indirect" fashion. During Space Shuttle mission STS-109, when floating in my sleeping bag and waiting for slumber to come, I would notice that occasionally my body would softly brush up against one side or the other of said sleeping bag. A ...


25

"[T]here seems to be no mention for the need to manually slow down the reaction wheel speed and instead merely applying an external torque has the effect of reducing the wheel speed. This confuses me because I thought that the wheel speed only depended on the current, which is something we supply and hence control. How does the application of an external ...


23

Ceramic bearings are a relatively new concept. They were a hot research topic in the late 1970s and didn't become commercially available until the mid 1990s. The Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer (FUSE), the first spacecraft on which these anomalous bearing failures were seen, was launched in 1999. It takes several years to multiple decades to design ...


22

Torque and/or mass. You can go with small reaction wheels which can only barely affect the attitude, or with massive ones, which... still barely affect the attitude. They are good for satellites that stay in the orbit for years, where you can afford hours per maneuver, but need years of operation. Meanwhile, RCS will run out of fuel quite fast, but it can ...


20

Background and Physics Note that there are actually two different but related types of actuators that use conservation of angular momentum1 to control a spacecraft's attitude (both of which may be lumped into "reaction wheel" by KSP): Reaction wheels (RWs, a.k.a momentum wheels) spin along a fixed axis at a variable speed. They change angular momentum by ...


20

[Background: I'm writing this as a developer whose firmware's in flight on several substantial satellite missions. I've developed attitude control systems, working directly with RW hardware engineers.] As Hash says, there is a lubrication distribution issue with conventional mechanical-bearing reaction wheels. The result is increased wear, leading to wear ...


17

For the record, there's actually a third possibility, Magnetorquers. Here's why you would use one vs the other. Magnetorquers - Inexpensive, low maintenance, but don't work in all situations. Used by LEO spacecraft typically, and small in size. They work by pushing off of a magnetic field. Reaction Wheels (Or Gyros) - The trick here is that you can't take ...


14

To answer your question "Is it true that..." then it is best to understand the context. The reaction wheel will be in a loop with a sensor that detects one or more dynamic properties of the satellite, such as an angle through a Earth or star sensor or a rate from a gyroscope. There are also likely to be some "external" actuators in a related control loop, ...


14

I found a great answer to your question from Robert Frost, Instructor and Flight Controller at NASA! It appears that the difference is one device has a dual purpose of stabilization as well as attitude control. The other has no active stabilization capability. Both are used for attitude control. Both are heavy flywheels. Both work by creating a ...


14

Could Stirling Engines work on sunlight alone? With the heated side facing the sun and the rest in its own shade, could two contra-rotating Vacuum Stirling Engines and flywheels, in tandem, accumulate torque, to power a reaction wheel? Yes. Can the heat from an ion engine be used to... power a Stirling engine? Yes! ...provide forward momentum this ...


11

The rate of change is pretty low with pretty low acceleration. (Consider the mass of the ISS(370,000 kilos) and the output of the Progress booster engines at just under 3000N of thrust). One interesting experiment to consider is something you can try on a train that has open gangways. I.e. The cars are connected and it is one long tube. Stand at either ...


11

It would be highly problematic for reaction wheels to serve dual purposes as reaction control devices and energy storage mechanisms. It might be possible, but the implementation would be extremely complicated. Starting with a simpler case of a three-wheel design, a desired spacecraft attitude and/or slew rate uniquely determines the wheel speed. That is, ...


11

The reason for this is Newton's first law of motion: When viewed in an inertial reference frame, an object either remains at rest or continues to move at a constant velocity, unless acted upon by a net force (from here). This is the version for point-like objects. For extended objects, the law applies to the center of mass. When it activates its ...


11

The thruster configuration can be seen better in this image:(cropped from this document ). The attitude control thrusters are not in plane with the direction control thrusters. This Raytheon patent on MKVs states that "attitude control system includes multiple thrusters offset from the center of gravity that provide yaw, pitch and roll control." All four of ...


11

Yes. It is done by magnetic torquers. Magnetic torquer bars can provide control about the wheel-less axis, but they must also continue to dump momentum from the wheels to prevent wheel speed saturation. (emphasis mine) Source Source Another good reference on the attitude control system is here.


10

I am just an enthusiast but I did work for a time as an intern at an aerospace company and had some exposure to satellite designs, mostly from the attitude control system programming viewpoint. That particular satellite had reaction wheels, magnetic bars and thrusters. The magnets were very useful to press against the Earth's magnetic field and allow the ...


10

There’s a very good answer to why all of those reaction wheels have been failing in a new video below. Basically, most of the spacecraft you’re referring to use the same kinds of reaction wheels from the same manufacturer. There’s some new studies that indicate solar activity has been causing damage to the wheels. Ok the plus side, more recent missions ...


9

Reaction wheels consist of an electric motor attached to a flywheel. There are two causes of failure: mechanical electrical MECHANICAL FAILURES Both the flywheels and the motor can be damaged by the G-forces and the vibration caused during launch. Once in space, lubricating the bearing is almost impossible which leads to increase in friction and ...


8

It depends on the system architecture and the needs of the mission. If you're trying to momentum bias the spacecraft then it will be running at a nominal speed. If you really want to conserve energy then you might bring it down all the way. If you're running four reaction wheels arranged tetrahedrally (as is often done to provide failure tolerance) then you ...


8

The study was specifically of ITHACO reaction-wheel assemblies that proved to be highly prone to failure in the space environment. These assemblies used steel bearings. Interference with electronics is certainly possible, but would not be limited to reaction wheels. Demagnetization of permanent magnets would require such extreme conditions that it would be ...


7

Virtually all systems that do this use some sort of a continuous process. The typical process is something like this: A large change in momentum is required. The momentum change is handled by the reaction wheel. Reaction wheels basically work by changing the rotation of the spacecraft. You can think of it like standing in the center a roundabout and turning ...


6

The short answer: yes, there are certain conditions that would allow desaturating reaction wheels without a secondary attitude control system (such as thrusters or magnetorquers), but those conditions are quite specific. Condition 1: You don't have to have the spacecraft at a certain attitude all the time. There might be times when you do want it at a ...


6

Reaction wheels are used to control attitude of the spacecraft and they work due to conservation of momentum. Let's say we have a reaction wheel on the x-axis of the space craft, aligned with the principle axis of inertia, then the total moment of inertia is $h = h_s + h_w$, where $h_s$ is the moment of inertia of the spacecraft (excluding the wheel) and $...


5

They can definitely feel it when, like in January 2009, the Russians mess up and send crazy command data, resulting in too high of an acceleration and scary oscillations. Video of the ISS rock and roll dance here - the burn is in progress when the video starts, and cuts off about halfway through. What I wouldn't give to have an exterior camera view of the ...


5

There are no reaction wheels on Voyager. They were new technology at the time (the first use I can find is the OGO series of satellites, first launched in 1964), that may have been an argument against their use. Voyager is not spin-stabilized. It used thrusters for stabilization, to provide a stationary platform for the cameras. I haven't been able to ...


5

Reaction wheels can store angular momentum up to a certain limit. If you Fourier analyze the torques on the satellite, some are constant and some are sinusoidal. The reaction wheels can store the sinusoidal part and deliver it back when the torque is the other direction. They don't help (in the long run) for the constant torques. For that, you need either ...


Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible