Skip to main content
91 votes

What led NASA et al. to decide the ISS should be a zero-g station when the massive negative health and quality of life impacts of zero-g were known?

Reliability. Any rotating station needs non-rotating components: solar panels need to face the Sun, radiators need to be shadowed, docking points need to be non-moving, and so on. Making a rotating ...
Mark's user avatar
  • 15.9k
70 votes

Why Mars instead of a space station?

The biggest advantage of Mars is there are resources available on that planet. Run out of oxygen? Make your own! Same with water. Set up refining, and you can make your own metal. Large windows are ...
PearsonArtPhoto's user avatar
  • 122k
55 votes

Why does there appear to be a 180-degree stereo microphone array outside the ISS?

That is a UHF antenna. It was well placed on the Lab to get in the way of robotics ops during space station assembly. This is a picture of a different UHF antenna unit (this one is on the P1 truss ...
Organic Marble's user avatar
54 votes

What led NASA et al. to decide the ISS should be a zero-g station when the massive negative health and quality of life impacts of zero-g were known?

I'll add one or two more items to Mark's excellent list. Stability - large rotating platforms (and they have to be large to produce useful artificial gravity) are subject to all sorts of precession. ...
Carl Witthoft's user avatar
48 votes
Accepted

Do space stations have anything that big spacecraft (such as the Space Shuttle and SpaceX Starship) don't have?

Space stations are huge, especially by comparison with the capsules that service them. As a point of comparison, the internal, pressurized volume of a Crew Dragon capsule, where the crew is seated for ...
Cadence's user avatar
  • 1,694
46 votes

Why Mars instead of a space station?

The big problem is that space is empty. To build the space station, people need to haul every single gram there. Every single atom on a space station needs to be shipped there at cost--whether it's ...
Dragongeek's user avatar
  • 21.7k
41 votes

What led NASA et al. to decide the ISS should be a zero-g station when the massive negative health and quality of life impacts of zero-g were known?

It's a good question, followed by many relevant responses so far. I'll focus on the physiology aspects. Research had been conducted for decades prior to ISS launch on creating artificial gravity ...
rugged orb's user avatar
37 votes

Is a midspace space station between Earth and Mars practical?

You're right: this has issues. You can insert a station into a circular orbit halfway between Earth and Mars, but because this has an orbital period also in between those of Earth and Mars, your ...
Hobbes's user avatar
  • 130k
37 votes
Accepted

What happens to astronaut sweat on the ISS?

They keep the ISS at a pretty comfortable temperature and humidity level, so there's not much sweat accumulation except when they're working out. For that, they use towels. The sweat that they do ...
Tristan's user avatar
  • 17.4k
31 votes

What led NASA et al. to decide the ISS should be a zero-g station when the massive negative health and quality of life impacts of zero-g were known?

There was a proposal to add an experimental rotating habitat: Nautilus-X. One of those wonderfully tortured backronyms: Non-Atmospheric Universal Transport Intended for Lengthy United States ...
Schwern's user avatar
  • 8,136
29 votes
Accepted

How best to maneuver inside a large room within a space station using only arm and leg motion?

It turns out that yes, there are things you can do, but they depend on things other than the astronaut's body, and they will take a long time. Physics tells us that an object's translational momentum ...
Tom Spilker's user avatar
  • 18.4k
28 votes
Accepted

Astronauts make a lot of CH₄ and some H₂ as well; do space capsules and space stations have systems to remove these?

For the ISS, the relevant bit of kit would be the Trace Contaminant Control System, which is part of the Air Revitalisation System. A Trace Contaminant Control System ensures that over 200 various ...
Starfish Prime's user avatar
27 votes

Why Mars instead of a space station?

Radiation I think this is actually the biggest concern, IMO. Astronauts aboard the ISS have a measurably increased risk of cancer due to their higher radiation exposure. Putting enough shielding on ...
Lawnmower Man's user avatar
24 votes

How best to maneuver inside a large room within a space station using only arm and leg motion?

Fortunately, it turns out humans come with a nitrogen/CO₂ thruster built in... Assuming the room is filled with air, I reckon the best method is to use your breath. What you should do is, point your ...
leftaroundabout's user avatar
24 votes

Does the speed of ISS slow down at the time of a spacewalk or does it become stationary?

Let's look at Newton's first law: Law I: Every body persists in its state of being at rest or of moving uniformly straight forward, except insofar as it is compelled to change its state by force ...
Polygnome's user avatar
  • 6,967
23 votes

Why does the material for space elevators have to be really strong?

Supplemental to the other answers; you are correct that the net force on the tether would be minimal, since the rotation of the counterweight would counteract the force of gravity. But, the ...
Maxander's user avatar
  • 331
23 votes

What can the ISS do that a SpaceX Starship could not?

ISS has a lot of truss constructions to attach equipment, such as power plants or scientific apparatuses. Starship would need these as well. ISS has many docks for visiting spacecrafts. Starship, ...
Anixx's user avatar
  • 3,186
21 votes

Are there any photo(s) of International Space Station (ISS) captured from above its altitude?

Yes. Most craft, when docking with the ISS do a fly-around to survey the docking site. They can then frequently capture images of the ISS from the top view. Here is one from the Shuttle Atlantis taken ...
Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩's user avatar
20 votes

Has a spacecraft ever docked with the same space station twice in one mission?

The first, experimental redocking was performed on Soyuz 29 (though by crew of Soyuz 31) with the Salyut 6 station. Afterwards, the maneuver was repeated several times, usually between different ...
SF.'s user avatar
  • 56k
20 votes

Just how much rope have different crewed missions been given?

Each shuttle mission had significant amounts of rope / cable / cordage aboard. tl;dr sky genies - 40 feet of rope per crewmember RMS rope reel - 80 feet of rope astrorope - 20 feet of rope per EVA ...
Organic Marble's user avatar
20 votes
Accepted

Have space station occupants always had a return vehicle ready?

Yes, all human occupied space stations to date have had a return vehicle for every crew member. To my knowledge (and general consensus), that includes Skylab, Salyut, Mir, Almaz and China's Tiangong. ...
geoffc's user avatar
  • 80.5k
19 votes
Accepted

Have space station modules already been replaced?

It hasn't happened yet, but ISS docking module Pirs is scheduled to be deorbited and replaced by laboratory module Nauka. Edit: It happened in July 2021 (see links)
Quentin Clarkson's user avatar
19 votes

Do space stations have anything that big spacecraft (such as the Space Shuttle and SpaceX Starship) don't have?

Couldn't something dock to the shuttle to provide it with further energy supplies? There was an Extended Duration Orbiter project for shuttle that included pallets in the payload bay carrying extra ...
Organic Marble's user avatar
18 votes
Accepted

Cyanobacteria as Life Support?

Why this wouldn't work? It works for the Earth; the reason why it is not implemented in space is purely in the engineering limitations. Cyanobacteria live in water, humans live in air. Gravity is ...
fraxinus's user avatar
  • 2,529
18 votes
Accepted

Will there be another joint International Space Station (ISS) after the current is retired?

As far as I'm aware there are no plans to build another "ISS". Instead NASA and ESA are helping to fund various commercial space stations: Axiom Orbital Segment Orbital Reef Starlab Haven-1
Alan Birtles's user avatar
  • 2,595
17 votes

Have space station modules already been replaced?

The only module(s) that kinda sorta fits this are/were the MPLMs - the Multi Purpose Logistics Modules. These modules were carried up by the Shuttle full of cargo, berthed to the ISS using robotics, ...
Organic Marble's user avatar
17 votes

What led NASA et al. to decide the ISS should be a zero-g station when the massive negative health and quality of life impacts of zero-g were known?

O'Neil cylinders have a very large minimum radius of several kilometers for a reason, or several reasons in fact. One can't just spin up a small station to simulate gravity and expect a person to be ...
DKNguyen's user avatar
  • 379
16 votes

Tiangong-1 reentry impact place probabilities

Simply put, that's where it spends most of the time. I think the chart is a bit exaggerated, but a satellite will be at it's northern and southern extrema far more. The pattern follows roughly a ...
PearsonArtPhoto's user avatar
  • 122k
16 votes
Accepted

Is there anything on the ISS that would be destroyed if that object were returned safetly to Earth?

Floating water (or other fluid) droplets cannot be returned to Earth without losing their form. Photo credit NASA
Organic Marble's user avatar
16 votes

What led NASA et al. to decide the ISS should be a zero-g station when the massive negative health and quality of life impacts of zero-g were known?

The other answers are good, but I think we miss something. Imagine a spacewalk around a rotating space station. With the current technology, we do need regular spacewalks. Everything dropped doesn't ...
fraxinus's user avatar
  • 2,529

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible