Skip to main content
DrZ214's user avatar
DrZ214's user avatar
DrZ214's user avatar
DrZ214
  • Member for 10 years
  • Last seen more than a month ago
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
revised
Are there any gaseous monopropellants?
added 51 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Are there any gaseous monopropellants?
@OrganicMarble I see, well I don't know anywhere near enough about chemistry to even think of nitpicking this. Might as well make an edit to the OP. I have similar doubts from often seeing liquid solutions described as separate ions and wonder if these are actually two different chemicals in a homogenous mixture, or somehow they can be considered one since the ions should attract and stick to each other.
revised
Are there any gaseous monopropellants?
added 179 characters in body
Loading…
comment
Are there any gaseous monopropellants?
I forgot the note that all substances are gasses at the right combination of temperature and pressure. Will edit the OP. I realize gasses are far less dense, but iirc there are still some tiny sats that use cold gas because liquid tanks need a gas pressurization tank anyway and all of that would be too heavy for it. But mostly my q is of curiosity. Why would gaseous monoprop chemicals apparently not exist?
asked
Loading…
awarded
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
In Apollo hardware, why were sump tanks needed?
And you know, via the topdown diagram, i can see now the limiting geometry is the radius between center and outer walls. Those tanks barely fit behind the outer wall. This brings up one more thing tho: The center section has 2 helium tanks, but how much of the engine sticks up into it? Cant find good diagram/pics of that. If needed i can do another question about this and structural loads, thanks for the info so far.
comment
In Apollo hardware, why were sump tanks needed?
but leaving them out to make a bigger section was apparently not an option. This is probably the key then. I did not think about Saturn 5 launch loads on the CSM at all, (but correct me if I'm wrong, the escape system only pulls the CM, not SM/LM). This also reminded me that the CSM was originally designed for direct ascent, engine was 2x more powerful than necessary. I guess that doesn't matter in the face of Saturn 5 launch loads anyway.
revised
Loading…
1
2 3 4 5
17