Timeline for How thick would a Marscrete structure need to be to provide adequate protection against radiation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2023 at 17:53 | answer | added | codeMonkey | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 8, 2018 at 16:25 | history | edited | PearsonArtPhoto♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 8, 2018 at 16:05 | vote | accept | Chris B. Behrens | ||
| Jan 8, 2018 at 16:04 | answer | added | PearsonArtPhoto♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 30, 2017 at 18:31 | comment | added | honeste_vivere | I think you need to set an upper energy limit to the radiation you wish to stop before this question has an answer. Meaning, to be hyperbolic, there is nothing thick enough to stop an infinitely energetic particle. If you only care about, say, particles up to 10 MeV, then one can get relatively accurate estimates of the minimum thickness for a whole zoo of materials (lots of different models do this). | |
| Jan 5, 2017 at 20:35 | comment | added | Chris B. Behrens | Not precisely, but surely within 25% or so, wouldn't you think? I mean the debate is over sulphur percentage, mostly, I think. | |
| Jan 5, 2017 at 11:26 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/816969143434022913 | ||
| Jan 5, 2017 at 8:51 | comment | added | GdD | There's no answer to this because there's no decided formula for Marscrete yet. It's being worked on, but until we know what the end composition will be we won't know how thick it would need to be. | |
| Jan 4, 2017 at 20:18 | history | edited | Chris B. Behrens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified question
|
| Jan 4, 2017 at 20:06 | history | asked | Chris B. Behrens | CC BY-SA 3.0 |