Timeline for What's so special about SpaceX's Raptor rocket engine with 300 Bar chamber pressure?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 12, 2017 at 14:14 | comment | added | nitsujri | @Raze please include the Hydrolox info in your answer. I had the same question after reading the phrase. | |
Jan 25, 2017 at 1:05 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | "so you may want to qualify in what ways" — I did. | |
Jan 25, 2017 at 0:53 | comment | added | Raze | @NathanTuggy but you did not say may want to qualify | |
Jan 25, 2017 at 0:17 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | For clarity, when I say "may want to qualify", I mean put it in the answer. Comments are transient. | |
Jan 25, 2017 at 0:16 | comment | added | Raze | @NathanTuggy it used Hydrolox not Methane and LOX | |
Jan 25, 2017 at 0:14 | history | edited | Nathan Tuggy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed spelling/grammar; improved clarity; formatted
|
Jan 25, 2017 at 0:11 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | Note that the SSME, with a lower chamber pressure of 20.64 MPa, achieved a sea-level ISP of 366 s, so you may want to qualify in what ways 334 s is "dreamlike". | |
Jan 24, 2017 at 23:59 | review | Late answers | |||
Jan 25, 2017 at 0:14 | |||||
Jan 24, 2017 at 23:39 | history | answered | Raze | CC BY-SA 3.0 |