Timeline for What will be the best way to convert nuclear fusion energy into thrust for a rocket?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2018 at 6:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/1053164123859677184 | ||
| Oct 17, 2018 at 18:08 | comment | added | Don Branson | @RomanReiner - then I pick "safest" and "easiest to maintain" - let's use a solar sail to convert the fusion energy of the Sun into thrust. | |
| Oct 17, 2018 at 10:50 | answer | added | Steve Linton | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 15, 2018 at 15:11 | answer | added | SF. | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 15, 2018 at 10:52 | comment | added | djr | So tempted to answer "Carefully"... | |
| Jan 15, 2018 at 10:46 | comment | added | Nathan Tuggy | @RomanReiner: We get two? | |
| Jan 15, 2018 at 9:25 | answer | added | peterh | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 15, 2018 at 1:08 | comment | added | Roman Reiner | "Best means maximum thrust, safest, easy to maintain." Pick two. | |
| Jan 14, 2018 at 22:38 | answer | added | Johnny Robinson | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 14, 2018 at 16:18 | answer | added | Mark Adler | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 14, 2018 at 15:43 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 15, 2018 at 8:59 | |||||
| Jan 14, 2018 at 15:33 | comment | added | harsh99 | @RussellBorogove Thanks for the link! Should I delete the question or wait to see if someone has a different view or wants to share his thoughts? | |
| Jan 14, 2018 at 15:29 | comment | added | Russell Borogove | No nuclear fusion propulsion system will be practical in a few years, or even a few decades. It's impossible to evaluate which approach is "best" because the technology isn't far enough along yet. You should check out Project Rho for various theoretically possible approaches. projectrho.com/public_html/rocket | |
| Jan 14, 2018 at 14:58 | history | asked | harsh99 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |