Skip to main content
25 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2018 at 0:46 vote accept Infiltrator
Jun 4, 2018 at 14:05 history edited geoffc
edited tags
Jun 3, 2018 at 23:06 history edited Infiltrator CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Jun 3, 2018 at 10:25 answer added Hobbes timeline score: 1
Jun 2, 2018 at 23:27 comment added user71659 @horsh Arguably, it was the collapse of the Soviet Union which gave the ISS political support in the West. The ISS, along with Sea Launch, was one of the projects to keep ex-Soviet aerospace industries employed, so that they would not sell missile technologies to nations like Pakistan and North Korea.
Jun 1, 2018 at 13:05 comment added user234461 @horsh Without the "Communist" (well, Leninist) rapid industrialisation of Russia and Russian spacefaring experience, the Yeltsin kleptocracy of a government could not have contributed anything. The ISS itself is the culmination of decades of US-USSR cooperation beginning with Apollo-Soyuz. So even if Yeltsin had pulled out of any planned Russian involvement, the USSR had already committed years of formal and practical cooperation without which the ISS would not be possible.
Jun 1, 2018 at 8:49 comment added Ian Kemp Communism? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Jun 1, 2018 at 4:46 history edited Infiltrator CC BY-SA 4.0
added 96 characters in body
May 31, 2018 at 0:49 comment added Infiltrator @horsh: interesting. Do you want to expand that into an answer?
May 30, 2018 at 15:33 comment added Stedy I would highly recommend Astronaut Scott Kelly's autobiography for a very interesting view on the different contributions to ISS by Russia and the US Amazon link
May 30, 2018 at 14:13 answer added Heopps timeline score: 9
May 30, 2018 at 10:54 comment added user54 Formally speaking, the Soviet Union has brought nothing. The Union has been dissolved in 1991. Even the very first Shuttle-Mir (so called "phase one", where "phase two" would be the construction of the ISS) agreement was signed by B.Yeltsin (as the president of Russian Federation already) and G.Bush in 1992.
May 30, 2018 at 1:30 history edited Infiltrator CC BY-SA 4.0
added 87 characters in body
May 30, 2018 at 1:28 comment added Infiltrator @Overmind: it was not sarcasm. I wanted an actual answer. I am actually very biased, and can give my own sarcastic answer.
May 29, 2018 at 19:22 comment added Kevin "What did… Russia bring to the ISS?" Americans.
May 29, 2018 at 18:17 comment added Organic Marble If it happens, the Boeing crew vehicle to the ISS will launch on Atlas.
May 29, 2018 at 17:01 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/1001508782743146497
May 29, 2018 at 16:08 comment added geoffc @Overmind To be fair ULA uses RD-180, Antares uses RD-191 (Half a RD-180, which itself is half a RD-170 from Zenit) and only Antares really does anything for the ISS (Cygnus booster). Though I guess 2 Cygnus's launched on Atlas V's so far... But the station assembly did not us Atlas at all.
May 29, 2018 at 15:19 answer added Organic Marble timeline score: 26
May 29, 2018 at 13:12 answer added Pavel Bernshtam timeline score: 43
May 29, 2018 at 12:20 comment added Overmind If your question was intended as sarcasm, note that NASA is still and will continue to use Russian rocket engines RD-180 .
May 29, 2018 at 10:55 comment added peterh youtube.com/watch?v=Y7tvauOJMHo :-)
May 29, 2018 at 10:52 answer added geoffc timeline score: 92
May 29, 2018 at 10:51 review First posts
May 29, 2018 at 10:54
May 29, 2018 at 10:46 history asked Infiltrator CC BY-SA 4.0