Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 13, 2018 at 5:46 comment added Hobbes and one more proviso for good measure...
Jun 13, 2018 at 5:45 history edited Hobbes CC BY-SA 4.0
added 22 characters in body
Jun 13, 2018 at 0:51 comment added Criticizing Israel not allowed "We can detect individual nuclear reactors (slowly) at a range fo a few meters," - which just highlights the uselessness in an amusing way, because we can also do that without a neutrino detector.
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:55 comment added dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten "We haven't made any that are sensitive enough to detect emissions from individual stars" should exclude the sun. I can list at least four experiments that worked on solar neutrino just off the top of my head.
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:54 comment added Hobbes I've made my answer more specific to exclude detections where the neutrino detector is right next to the reactor.
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:53 history edited Hobbes CC BY-SA 4.0
added 31 characters in body
Jun 12, 2018 at 19:49 comment added dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten "We haven't made any that are sensitive enough to detect emissions from individual nuclear reactors. " Is simply un-true. The first detection (in 1956) was done using the flux from a a single reactor. There are designs (and prototypes) in the nuclear non-proliferation community for compact, self-contained units designed to measure fuel composition and burn-up in reactors.
Jun 12, 2018 at 18:28 comment added Uwe There are low energy neutrino detectors too measuring solar neutrinos as well as neutrinos from CERN, see Borexino. Not as massive as a supernova.
Jun 12, 2018 at 14:28 comment added Steve Linton We can detect individual nuclear reactors (slowly) at a range fo a few meters, but we can't detect them from space.
Jun 12, 2018 at 13:43 history answered Hobbes CC BY-SA 4.0