Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 12, 2019 at 5:36 history closed DrSheldon
Organic Marble
Vikki
Nathan Tuggy
peterh
Opinion-based
Jan 11, 2019 at 23:50 review Close votes
Jan 12, 2019 at 5:36
Jan 11, 2019 at 23:23 comment added jpmc26 "...because then we will never be sure if life can actually grow there." ... The moon, lacking atmosphere, shielding from cosmic radiation, and a number of other important factors for life, is almost certainly never going to be able to support it. If by some freak accident that changes, it almost certainly won't be for millions or billions of years. Why is disrupting a hypothetical future that probably won't happen and that we have very little chance of realistically disrupting an ethical concern? I can only respond to this with "wat."
Jan 11, 2019 at 22:35 answer added Caleb Jay timeline score: 12
Jan 11, 2019 at 22:02 comment added Rob Crawford Space has dropped plenty of material on Earth; it's time we returned the favor.
Jan 11, 2019 at 19:29 comment added Nuclear Hoagie It's effectively impossible to prove a negative; we will never be able to claim with 100% certainty that any celestial body is completely devoid of life. Does that make the prospect of stellar colonization an unethical venture from the get-go?
Jan 11, 2019 at 18:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/1083785684413022213
Jan 11, 2019 at 16:28 answer added uhoh timeline score: 28
Jan 11, 2019 at 16:27 comment added Organic Marble What system of ethics?
Jan 11, 2019 at 16:12 history edited PearsonArtPhoto CC BY-SA 4.0
added 5 characters in body; edited tags
Jan 11, 2019 at 16:12 answer added PearsonArtPhoto timeline score: 10
Jan 11, 2019 at 16:10 review First posts
Jan 11, 2019 at 16:42
Jan 11, 2019 at 16:07 history asked jonvyltra CC BY-SA 4.0