Timeline for Is there an algorithm to determine the subset of orbital parameters for vehicles in a cone?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2014 at 15:35 | answer | added | Tristan | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 26, 2014 at 18:15 | comment | added | AnonSubmitter85 | @MarkAdler It's a normal cone; I just used the term half cone so that it would not be interpreted as a double cone. | |
| Jan 26, 2014 at 5:00 | comment | added | Mark Adler | What do you mean "half cone"? | |
| Jan 25, 2014 at 22:54 | history | edited | TildalWave | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed a typo
|
| Jan 25, 2014 at 21:59 | history | edited | AnonSubmitter85 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Made clear that I am after only a simple orbital model.
|
| Jan 24, 2014 at 16:51 | answer | added | Niket | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jan 23, 2014 at 17:22 | comment | added | AnonSubmitter85 | @PearsonArtPhoto But that's a fundamentally different problem. What I am interested in is not whether a vehicle with a given set parameters is visible; rather, given that a vehicle is visible, what is the subset of orbital parameters that it must belong to. | |
| Jan 23, 2014 at 16:23 | comment | added | PearsonArtPhoto♦ | In theory, one could do this with equations, but it would really end up quite complex. In practice, it's usually easier to figure out where the satellite is, and if it's visible from the point on Earth. | |
| Jan 23, 2014 at 13:13 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackSpaceExp/status/426342015283249152 | ||
| S Jan 23, 2014 at 12:53 | history | edited | Everyone | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Edited title to concur with the description
|
| S Jan 23, 2014 at 12:53 | history | suggested | Vedant Chandra | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling change
|
| Jan 23, 2014 at 12:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jan 23, 2014 at 12:53 | |||||
| Jan 23, 2014 at 1:39 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 23, 2014 at 11:25 | |||||
| Jan 23, 2014 at 1:21 | history | asked | AnonSubmitter85 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
