Skip to main content
28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 14, 2019 at 1:00 history closed Rory Alsop
Manu H
user10509
Vikki
Mark Omo
Needs details or clarity
Apr 13, 2019 at 19:36 comment added peterh @Muze I think a liquid metal shield, whose form is controlled diamagnetically, could work.
Apr 13, 2019 at 19:24 comment added Muze @peterh is it practical though? Hobbies answer makes a good point. I would like to see some of your answers. I have some questions that have no answers. And thank you for advocating.
Apr 13, 2019 at 19:08 comment added peterh @OrganicMarble I admit that it is far over the current technological possibilities, and it is questionable that it would be the better as the possible alternatives. But, I also can't see any essential reason why it could not work.
Apr 13, 2019 at 19:05 vote accept Muze
Apr 13, 2019 at 19:03 history edited Muze CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 11 characters in body
Apr 13, 2019 at 18:56 answer added Hobbes timeline score: 4
Apr 13, 2019 at 18:46 comment added Hobbes closer permanently, or just a close flyby?
Apr 13, 2019 at 17:40 comment added Organic Marble @peterh got any calculations or references to back that up? I can imagine a lot of things, but that doesn't mean they are worth anything, without putting in the work. youtube.com/watch?v=rZBHits8JPI
Apr 13, 2019 at 17:12 history edited Muze CC BY-SA 4.0
added 88 characters in body
Apr 13, 2019 at 16:23 comment added peterh @OrganicMarble I imagine a layer of liquid tungsten, behind that another layer of solid tungsten, behind that the ordinary mirror-based heat protection and active cooling. Such a construction could visit the upper atmosphere of the Sun.
Apr 13, 2019 at 16:05 history rollback Muze
Rollback to Revision 5 - added 192 characters in body
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:49 history edited Muze CC BY-SA 4.0
added 192 characters in body
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:41 history edited Muze CC BY-SA 4.0
added 192 characters in body
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:28 comment added peterh @OrganicMarble But they melt, if there is too hot.
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:26 comment added peterh @Uwe I think although liquid iron would radiate intensively, this radiation (1500C) would be far lesser than the Sun's (6000K). Although it wouldn't be ferromagnetic, but it could be still manipulated on diamagnetic ways.
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:09 history undeleted Muze
Apr 13, 2019 at 15:08 history deleted Muze via Vote
Apr 13, 2019 at 13:36 comment added Organic Marble Thermal tiles weigh a lot less.
Apr 13, 2019 at 10:21 comment added Uwe A hot molten metal like iron would not deliver a good cool shadow. It would radiate intensively in the infrared and visible spectrum. If it's temperature is in steady state, it will radiate away all that energy received from the sun. The spacecraft would need a heatshield against the radiation of the liquid metal.
Apr 13, 2019 at 9:45 review Close votes
Apr 14, 2019 at 1:00
Apr 13, 2019 at 9:30 comment added Rory Alsop Why do you say unattached but needing to exert force? And why would you want to transport it near the sun? What is it you are trying to achieve?
Apr 13, 2019 at 7:54 comment added Hobbes the question is, why would you want your material to be in a liquid state and unattached? It'd be much easier to have the material as a solid, in panels on the outside of the hull if you want to use it as shielding.
Apr 13, 2019 at 5:16 history edited Muze CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body; edited tags
Apr 13, 2019 at 1:19 history edited uhoh CC BY-SA 4.0
added 262 characters in body
Apr 13, 2019 at 1:13 history edited Muze CC BY-SA 4.0
added 28 characters in body
Apr 13, 2019 at 0:42 comment added Muze @uhoh few meters but if a bubble was inside it to lessen the weight, air or something would it still remain a stable sphere with the pocket in the center when nears the sun?
Apr 12, 2019 at 18:48 history asked Muze CC BY-SA 4.0