Timeline for How strict are dispenser integrators when a CubeSat requirement is not met?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2019 at 0:23 | comment | added | Greg | Talk to your integrator well in advance, they hate surprises. | |
| Dec 12, 2019 at 22:31 | answer | added | Terrance Yee | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 22, 2019 at 14:15 | comment | added | Carlos N | I'm afraid the only answer to this is "it depends" on the integrator and teh requirement. Integrators other than CalPoly often do NOT follow the CubeSat standard or only follow it loosely. As @GittingGud said - contact your integrator to find out. | |
| Jul 4, 2019 at 9:51 | comment | added | PeteBlackerThe3rd | Regarding this specific requirement. The rail ends are a major load path from the launcher to your satellite, especially if your mounted axially on the rocket. Its possible you could compensate by using a stronger material on the rail ends. But all this would need approval from your launch provider. | |
| Jul 4, 2019 at 6:44 | comment | added | GittingGud | I would contact the dispenser integrator and ask them directly. CubeSats are not as standardized as they were supposed to be because everybody has special needs in their design. Because of this I would assume many dispensers are a bit flexible. Nevertheless you might (probably) loose insurance on your payload in case of the CubeSat not dispensing because of the design not sticking to the standards. | |
| Jul 3, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/1146524147171958784 | ||
| Jul 3, 2019 at 16:29 | history | edited | Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
tidied
|
| Jul 3, 2019 at 15:50 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 3, 2019 at 16:02 | |||||
| Jul 3, 2019 at 15:47 | history | asked | hopper19 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |