Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 9, 2020 at 9:55 vote accept Cornelis
Dec 9, 2019 at 23:00 answer added SE - stop firing the good guys timeline score: 5
Dec 9, 2019 at 18:09 history edited Cornelis CC BY-SA 4.0
changed the question somewhat
Dec 9, 2019 at 17:52 history edited Cornelis CC BY-SA 4.0
changed the question somewhat
Dec 9, 2019 at 17:42 history edited Cornelis CC BY-SA 4.0
replaced a word
Dec 9, 2019 at 17:37 comment added uhoh @Cornelisinspace oh I see, this is about "manual" collection and careful placement, not natural aggregation. Got it! You just need enough mass to overcome tidal and other multi-body forces and solar pressure for example.
Dec 9, 2019 at 17:36 comment added Organic Marble Excellent point, if edited into question.
Dec 9, 2019 at 17:35 comment added Cornelis @OrganicMarble A new, lighter moon at a stable point near Earth could be an important "stepping stone" for space exploration !
Dec 9, 2019 at 17:30 comment added Organic Marble Relevance to space exploration?
Dec 9, 2019 at 17:29 comment added Cornelis @uhoh When you place them really close to each other they don't have to collide. I I could imagine that the Sun's gravity could tear the asteroids apart a bit.
Dec 9, 2019 at 17:26 comment added uhoh They can only really aggregate if they can lose kinetic energy somehow by friction and heating during many many collisions. Gravity alone will alter their orbits, but as they start to affect each other they'll speed up relative to their center, rather than slow down. They'll need to "cool" somehow before they can slow down and aggregate.
Dec 9, 2019 at 17:05 history edited Cornelis CC BY-SA 4.0
small change to the question
Dec 9, 2019 at 15:56 history asked Cornelis CC BY-SA 4.0