Timeline for At what speed does it seem like you are going lightspeed due to time dilation?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 11, 2020 at 18:03 | history | edited | called2voyage♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Mar 8, 2020 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/1236622896442859520 | ||
Mar 2, 2020 at 23:12 | comment | added | Christopher James Huff | The concept of rapidity is relevant to your question: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapidity | |
Mar 2, 2020 at 22:42 | vote | accept | qazwsx | ||
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:59 | answer | added | hobbs | timeline score: 11 | |
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:26 | comment | added | Mefitico | @qazwsx : Clocks themselves (i.e. with no external reference) are not aware of time dilation, they just keep doing their thing. If they were able to notice relativistic effects, they'd be able to compute their speed relative to an inertial frame. | |
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:25 | review | Close votes | |||
Mar 3, 2020 at 3:39 | |||||
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:22 | answer | added | Oscar Smith | timeline score: -1 | |
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:08 | comment | added | qazwsx | @Mefitico it does not have to be a human, I'm just talking about what the internal clocks would show | |
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:07 | comment | added | Mefitico | I don't think there is a good definition of "seem like", as there are no studies (AFAIK) on how humans perceive time/space dilation effects. | |
Mar 2, 2020 at 17:48 | comment | added | user7073 | All velocities are relative, so you can't really go 99.999% the speed of light, you can only do that in reference to other objects. However, I understand what you're askng. You can google to find the relativistic formulas, but I'm almost sure the answer is sqrt(2)/2 times the speed of light. | |
Mar 2, 2020 at 17:43 | history | asked | qazwsx | CC BY-SA 4.0 |