Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 11, 2020 at 18:03 history edited called2voyage
edited tags
Mar 8, 2020 at 12:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/1236622896442859520
Mar 2, 2020 at 23:12 comment added Christopher James Huff The concept of rapidity is relevant to your question: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapidity
Mar 2, 2020 at 22:42 vote accept qazwsx
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:59 answer added hobbs timeline score: 11
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:26 comment added Mefitico @qazwsx : Clocks themselves (i.e. with no external reference) are not aware of time dilation, they just keep doing their thing. If they were able to notice relativistic effects, they'd be able to compute their speed relative to an inertial frame.
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:25 review Close votes
Mar 3, 2020 at 3:39
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:22 answer added Oscar Smith timeline score: -1
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:08 comment added qazwsx @Mefitico it does not have to be a human, I'm just talking about what the internal clocks would show
Mar 2, 2020 at 20:07 comment added Mefitico I don't think there is a good definition of "seem like", as there are no studies (AFAIK) on how humans perceive time/space dilation effects.
Mar 2, 2020 at 17:48 comment added user7073 All velocities are relative, so you can't really go 99.999% the speed of light, you can only do that in reference to other objects. However, I understand what you're askng. You can google to find the relativistic formulas, but I'm almost sure the answer is sqrt(2)/2 times the speed of light.
Mar 2, 2020 at 17:43 history asked qazwsx CC BY-SA 4.0