Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 29, 2015 at 13:03 comment added kenorb @ZoltánSchmidt They did, but people don't need to know about it.
Jul 9, 2015 at 12:19 history edited TildalWave
edited tags
Apr 24, 2014 at 23:05 vote accept Zoltán Schmidt
Apr 23, 2014 at 9:36 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackSpaceExp/status/458902185112526850
Apr 23, 2014 at 8:02 comment added Zoltán Schmidt @DavidHammen Rovers can bring several useful tools and deviced to Mars, but the amount of these stuff is limited since the rover must be able to move. If we wouldn't deal with being able to move, we may send even more tools and devices to measure and analyze - or am I wrong?
Apr 23, 2014 at 3:46 answer added TildalWave timeline score: 49
Apr 23, 2014 at 1:26 answer added David Hammen timeline score: 5
Apr 22, 2014 at 21:22 answer added Jerard Puckett timeline score: 3
Apr 22, 2014 at 21:15 history edited user12 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body; edited title
Apr 22, 2014 at 21:10 history edited user12 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body; edited title
Apr 22, 2014 at 20:55 comment added Quora Feans I imagine the OP means to have a fixed lab at a convenient location, and a smaller rover collecting samples and bringing them to this lab. New more capable rovers could go further in the future and bring more samples. All instruments would be in the lab, and the rover would be designed just to move as far as possible, not carrying a lab on its back. Sounds like a good design idea to separate concerns.
Apr 22, 2014 at 20:36 answer added john3103 timeline score: 15
Apr 22, 2014 at 18:51 answer added Hobbes timeline score: 20
Apr 22, 2014 at 18:50 comment added David Hammen And the point would be? What has been done is to send pre-fab buildings, except there's little if any room inside those buildings. They're called landers instead of rovers.
Apr 22, 2014 at 16:52 history asked Zoltán Schmidt CC BY-SA 3.0