Timeline for What prevents SpaceX from increasing the cadence of launches?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2020 at 8:39 | vote | accept | Joe Jobs | ||
| Aug 6, 2020 at 22:48 | comment | added | user20636 | could do with a few sources... | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 0:45 | comment | added | Joe Jobs | I think they need more launch sites anyways for the big plans with Starship ahead. The time to bring back first stages from the sea is not a limiting factor since they dont have to use the same booster for next flight. Maybe they dont want to destroy competition by stealing all their clients | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 0:16 | history | edited | geoffc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 171 characters in body
|
| Aug 5, 2020 at 0:14 | comment | added | geoffc | @JoeJobs I dunno if Boca Chica counts. :) At least not for F9. But good quibble. | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 22:44 | comment | added | Joe Jobs | As of 2020, SpaceX operates four launch facilities: Cape Canaveral Space Launch Complex 40 (SLC-40), Vandenberg Air Force Base Space Launch Complex 4E (SLC-4E), Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A), and South Texas Launch Site. | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 22:39 | comment | added | Joe Jobs | If Starship needs payload fairings then they have to extend the payload fairing production capacity anyways. Since they want to launch one Starahip per week that needs a lot of manufacturing even when reusing those fairings | |
| Aug 4, 2020 at 22:21 | history | answered | geoffc | CC BY-SA 4.0 |