Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 13, 2020 at 22:24 history edited uhoh CC BY-SA 4.0
added 615 characters in body
Dec 13, 2020 at 22:21 comment added uhoh @asdfex but I'll fortify the first sentence accordingly.
Dec 13, 2020 at 22:19 comment added uhoh @asdfex I think that the introduction "Partial answer only, I don' know what I'm doing exactly..." is sufficient warning to avoid that, and SE works on the principle that answers without up votes are less likely to be correct. This post explains that there is some dissonance between the first attempt at an analytical and the numerical reality, and serves as a warning that an analytical solution will have to do better. Science and math build from failed attempts. Rockets work because their spectacular failures were scrutinized in the light of day rather than hidden.
Dec 13, 2020 at 9:43 comment added asdfex I think this answer should be removed until the issues with the calculation are solved. In the current form it might be confusing to readers.
Dec 12, 2020 at 3:42 comment added uhoh I've just asked Why did my vis-viva math solution get so close despite being wrong? Under what conditions would it have been a good approximation?
Dec 12, 2020 at 3:33 history answered uhoh CC BY-SA 4.0