Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 30, 2021 at 1:50 history edited Kav CC BY-SA 4.0
added 101 characters in body
Apr 30, 2021 at 1:06 review Reopen votes
Apr 30, 2021 at 11:42
Apr 30, 2021 at 0:40 history edited Kav CC BY-SA 4.0
added 241 characters in body; edited title
Apr 30, 2021 at 0:35 comment added uhoh voting to re-open as this question is 100% on-topic and should never have been insta-closed and answer authors should not have been blocked from answering. You might not get the best answer here, but planetary science is considered on topic, and has been from nearly the beginning of the site. We do not close questions as "better asked on..." or "better answered on...".
Apr 30, 2021 at 0:32 comment added uhoh @DrSheldon my discussion of planetary science demonstrates that questions here absolutely do not have to be "about space missions" to be on-topic here. Once something has been decided we should stick to it, or move to change it. The "about space missions" thing is a false flag.
Apr 30, 2021 at 0:30 review Reopen votes
Apr 30, 2021 at 0:37
Apr 30, 2021 at 0:28 comment added uhoh @DrSheldon cosmic ray spallation produces the electrons trapped in Earth's inner Van Allen radiation belt. and Nuclear spallation occurs naturally in Earth's atmosphere owing to the impacts of cosmic rays, and also on the surfaces of bodies in space such as meteorites and the Moon. Evidence of cosmic ray spallation (also known as "spoliation") is seen on outer surfaces of bodies, and gives a means of measuring the length of time of exposure.
Apr 30, 2021 at 0:19 comment added uhoh @DrSheldon so we can be certain that all answers here will be improper answers? We can know that they will not contain any observations or experimental results that overlap with the exploration of space? We know this with such a level of confidence that we must prevent them before they are written?
Apr 30, 2021 at 0:18 comment added DrSheldon @uhoh: Yes, but it still needs to have some connection to space exploration. This question does not; it is theoretical and has no bearing on space missions. We have questions on food, but that does not make every question about food on-topic. I have no problem with the question being migrated where it can be properly answered.
Apr 30, 2021 at 0:15 history edited uhoh CC BY-SA 4.0
edited tags
Apr 30, 2021 at 0:14 comment added uhoh @DrSheldon we have 253 questions tagged with planetary-science and these being on-topic here has been discussed at length in meta. After reviewing all of that are you still convinced that the effect of cosmic rays and energetic particles in the space environment near Venus on it's atmosphere, something that has been and will be further explored in space is off-topic here and that answers must quickly be prevented
Apr 29, 2021 at 19:20 history closed GdD
DrSheldon
Fred
Harish Chandra Rajpoot
Mark Omo
Not suitable for this site
Apr 29, 2021 at 16:14 comment added DrSheldon Welcome. How is this question connected to space exploration? If humans had never ventured beyond the atmosphere, this question would (in the proper forum) still be an answerable question. Therefore, space exploration has nothing to do with this question, and it is off-topic here.
Apr 29, 2021 at 15:43 comment added Fred Neutron produced Phosphorus-32 in the Barwell and St. Severin Meteorites
Apr 29, 2021 at 15:03 review Close votes
Apr 29, 2021 at 19:20
Apr 29, 2021 at 14:35 review First posts
Apr 29, 2021 at 18:52
Apr 29, 2021 at 14:35 history asked Kav CC BY-SA 4.0