Timeline for Is there a name for views of orbital paths that ignore some motions versus those that don't?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S May 30, 2021 at 7:15 | history | suggested | Nilay Ghosh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
hyperlinked the links into the text; blockquoted the statements
|
May 30, 2021 at 4:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S May 30, 2021 at 7:15 | |||||
May 29, 2021 at 9:45 | history | edited | Ng Ph | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 994 characters in body
|
May 29, 2021 at 7:55 | comment | added | Ng Ph | @Luc, There is another aspect of your question that I may have overlooked. What is the background of the users of your animation? Indeed, sometime using a scientifically adopted naming can add confusion. For ex., the name ECEF refers to rotating axis (the X and Y axis rotate at the same speed as Earth spins), "fixed" being understood as: as rotating reference frame so that this reference appear as FIX for an (any) observer on the surface. If your definition of "good name" is to avoid misinterpretations by people not too much math-inclined, then good answers may differ from above. | |
May 28, 2021 at 21:28 | history | edited | Ng Ph | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
May 28, 2021 at 18:08 | history | answered | Ng Ph | CC BY-SA 4.0 |