Return to Answer

Here he has a photo where he used 4 SB800 strobes, 2 with gels used behind the group, 1 at least serving as key and commander to the slaves.

Compared to 2018, it looks like the GLA's got updated.

Here he has a photo where he used 4 SB800 strobes, 2 with gels used behind the group and 1 serving as key and another as commander to all the slaves.

Compared to 2018, it looks like the GLA's have not been updated (Kibo GLA's had a high failure rate when first installed).

I've tried to find other photos where they use the strobes creatively in the ISS but there does not seem to be many.

Commander Alan Poindexter however did manage at least a creative group shot back in 2010 on STS-131.

He unfortunately passed away two years later, but not before writing a really great article about being taught to use the camera equipment on their mission and the results.

https://luminous-landscape.com/photography-in-space/

Here he has a photo where he used 4 SB800 strobes, 2 with gels used behind the group, 1 at least serving as key and commander to the slaves.

Compared to 2018, it looks like the GLA's got updated.

Also note the placement of the lighting fixtures - this helps orient the crew to where the ceiling is - its where the lights are, and where they are not is the floor.

I'm thinking it is not to do with the LED lighting system at all, but rather the crew having fun.

There is a single hard light behind the subjects in all of the related photos i have seen.

The photos are harshly processed in order to bring out the colors more.

The most numerous brand of camera on the station is the Nikon DSLR (IIRC chosen for its radiation protection which was rated better than Canons at the time of selection).

Particular models have a remote commander built in.

Particular strobe units have a remote commander built in.

In both cases these can fire other separate strobes remotely.

In most cases the strobes came with a pack of colored gels with which to make, sometimes fancy, effects.

I know other brands can do this but Nikon had it built in to their system for a while which certainly made it more accessible than if using others, especially at the time that these would have gone up to the station.

For reference, the SSLA LED system is fixed to 3 variations of white light only.

The SSLM does not have any obvious ability to change its colors.

The LED system is fixed in place, sitting in place of where the GLA used to be, and that means it is not likely to be a bright floating source behind the subjects in these photos.

Of course the crew could have brought up their own photographic equipment and accessories to use.

Three pre-determined light settings are envisaged for use in different operational settings. Specifications for Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) and luminance in candelas (cd) settings:

1. a General Illumination setting - 4500 K white light, 210 cd.
2. a Pre-Sleep setting - 2700 K (blue-depleted) white light, 90 cd or ideally lower.
3. a Phase Shift/Alertness setting - 6500 K (blue-enriched) white light, 420 cd.

“While the multi LED system can provide millions of different light spectra, we plan to use three settings for now,”

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=2013

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=640

Late addition: I found a reference to the pictures by Jack:

https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/month-space-pictures-jupiter-s-giant-red-spot-ncsl788416

But no technical explanations though.

I'm thinking it is not to do with the LED lighting system at all, but rather the crew having fun.

There is a single hard light behind the subjects in all of the related photos i have seen.

The photos are harshly processed in order to bring out the colors more.

The most numerous brand of camera on the station is the Nikon DSLR (IIRC chosen for its radiation protection which was rated better than Canons at the time of selection).

Particular models have a remote commander built in.

Particular strobe units have a remote commander built in.

In both cases these can fire other separate strobes remotely.

In most cases the strobes came with a pack of colored gels with which to make, sometimes fancy, effects.

I know other brands can do this but Nikon had it built in to their system for a while which certainly made it more accessible than if using others, especially at the time that these would have gone up to the station.

For reference, the SSLA LED system is fixed to 3 variations of white light only.

The SSLM does not have any obvious ability to change its colors.

The LED system is fixed in place, sitting in place of where the GLA used to be, and that means it is not likely to be a bright floating source behind the subjects in these photos.

Of course the crew could have brought up their own photographic equipment and accessories to use.

Three pre-determined light settings are envisaged for use in different operational settings. Specifications for Correlated Color Temperature (CCT) and luminance in candelas (cd) settings:

1. a General Illumination setting - 4500 K white light, 210 cd.
2. a Pre-Sleep setting - 2700 K (blue-depleted) white light, 90 cd or ideally lower.
3. a Phase Shift/Alertness setting - 6500 K (blue-enriched) white light, 420 cd.

“While the multi LED system can provide millions of different light spectra, we plan to use three settings for now,”

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=2013

https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/explorer/Investigation.html?#id=640

Late addition: I found a reference to the pictures by Jack:

https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/month-space-pictures-jupiter-s-giant-red-spot-ncsl788416

But no technical explanations though. (They actually just quoted his tweet)