Skip to main content
5 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 7, 2021 at 22:41 comment added Ng Ph And even if, for the sake of argumentation, it could be easy to understand that it is "not very constraining" (still not obvious for me, to be honest), the "why" in your question is not answered by such triviality, even if demonstrated. It can only be answered by the observation, as pointed out by @David Hammen, that some parts must remain warm. Apparently, this (tbs) thermal goal will not be met if the spacecraft remains in a penumbra for a given (tbd) duration. Such a demonstration would be a full answer to your question.
Dec 7, 2021 at 20:22 comment added Ng Ph Recall that the requirements just give the maximum allowable Z and Y swings. Nothing can tell us (at least me!) that smaller orbits within the allowed "box" would not give some desirable features (freedom of launch window? stability?...). So "non-issue" is a bit far-reaching conclusion. "Not very constraining" would be a correct qualification for the no-eclipse-allowed requirement. Also, the displayed orbit is just one representative example, not the actual one nor the "targetted" one.
Dec 7, 2021 at 2:36 history edited Woody CC BY-SA 4.0
clarity
Dec 6, 2021 at 23:06 comment added Ng Ph I can't understand why this is an answer to your "why" question.
Dec 6, 2021 at 22:12 history answered Woody CC BY-SA 4.0