Timeline for Was Tianwen-1 the first "triple-depl"? (orbiter-deploys-lander-deploys-rover-deploys-selfie cam) What are the highly hierarchical deep space missions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 14 at 20:00 | vote | accept | uhoh | ||
Jan 2, 2022 at 22:37 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 585 characters in body
|
Jan 2, 2022 at 22:29 | comment | added | uhoh | @Ludo ya while I did mention "deep space mission" a few times, I've added "after leaving cis-lunar space" in italics to the first sentence to emphasize that only deployment, but I really like the way you point out that all four of Tianwen-1's triple deployment members were functioning independently at the same time (for a period of time at least, not sure if the selfie cam had any solar capability) so I will think about how to update without invalidating JörgWMittag's existing answer. I should have defined this more carefully in the beginning. | |
Jan 2, 2022 at 22:24 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
Jan 2, 2022 at 20:04 | comment | added | Ludo | I think you need to define "deployment" a bit to differentiate it from staging. Something like the "deployer" fulfilling non-trivial operations after releasing the "deployee"? Otherwise I'm going with S-1C deploying S-II deploying S-IVB deploying CSM+LM deploying LM deploying LRV deploying astronaut deploying ALSEP, like @JörgWMittag proposes ;-) | |
Jan 1, 2022 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/1477248265640939529 | ||
Dec 31, 2021 at 14:16 | history | became hot network question | |||
Dec 31, 2021 at 10:39 | comment | added | uhoh | @JörgWMittag I'd certainly go along with it! :-) | |
Dec 31, 2021 at 10:22 | answer | added | Jörg W Mittag | timeline score: 4 | |
Dec 31, 2021 at 10:12 | comment | added | Jörg W Mittag | Would something like Apollo CSM deploys Apollo LM deploys LRV deploys astronaut deploys shovel count? | |
Dec 30, 2021 at 23:33 | comment | added | uhoh | Since researching one aspect of the question will likely produce the answer for the other aspect at the same time, I think it's better in this case to keep it all in one place rather than break this up into two highly related questions. | |
Dec 30, 2021 at 23:31 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
Dec 30, 2021 at 23:25 | history | asked | uhoh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |