Skip to main content
added 115 characters in body
Source Link
PearsonArtPhoto
  • 121.7k
  • 22
  • 354
  • 620

The expiration date on the solid rocket booster wasn't actually for the boosters themselves, but connecting hardwareassembled product. The clock didn't start with the manufacturing of the booster segments, but when they were combined together atcombined together near the launch pad.

I can't find a source, but I believe the timer is for the o-rings and connecting hardware. The concern is that the same thing could happen that happened with the Challenger, the seal breaks mid-flight and causes fire to come out the wrong area, leading to the same issues that happened with the Challenger breakup.

If there had been a determination that this timer was expired it would have required disassembling the segments of the solid rockets and rebuilding with fresh connecting hardware. The same segments could have been used with the same fuel.

The expiration date on the solid rocket booster wasn't actually for the boosters themselves, but connecting hardware. The clock didn't start with the manufacturing of the booster segments, but when they were combined together at the launch pad.

I can't find a source, but I believe the timer is for the o-rings and connecting hardware. The concern is that the same thing could happen that happened with the Challenger, the seal breaks mid-flight and causes fire to come out the wrong area, leading to the same issues that happened with the Challenger breakup.

If there had been a determination that this timer was expired it would have required disassembling the segments of the solid rockets and rebuilding with fresh connecting hardware. The same segments could have been used with the same fuel.

The expiration date on the solid rocket booster wasn't actually for the boosters themselves, but assembled product. The clock didn't start with the manufacturing of the booster segments, but when they were combined together near the launch pad.

I can't find a source, but I believe the timer is for the o-rings and connecting hardware. The concern is that the same thing could happen that happened with the Challenger, the seal breaks mid-flight and causes fire to come out the wrong area, leading to the same issues that happened with the Challenger breakup.

If there had been a determination that this timer was expired it would have required disassembling the segments of the solid rockets and rebuilding with fresh connecting hardware. The same segments could have been used with the same fuel.

Source Link
PearsonArtPhoto
  • 121.7k
  • 22
  • 354
  • 620

The expiration date on the solid rocket booster wasn't actually for the boosters themselves, but connecting hardware. The clock didn't start with the manufacturing of the booster segments, but when they were combined together at the launch pad.

I can't find a source, but I believe the timer is for the o-rings and connecting hardware. The concern is that the same thing could happen that happened with the Challenger, the seal breaks mid-flight and causes fire to come out the wrong area, leading to the same issues that happened with the Challenger breakup.

If there had been a determination that this timer was expired it would have required disassembling the segments of the solid rockets and rebuilding with fresh connecting hardware. The same segments could have been used with the same fuel.