Skip to main content
Bounty Ended with 100 reputation awarded by uhoh
added 567 characters in body
Source Link
blobbymcblobby
  • 12.6k
  • 49
  • 72

In 2019, dust removal of some kind was still listed as something that needs to be looked at:

Although Compact Telescoping Surface Array for Mars Solar Power was considered as most promising for future Mars solar array technology, dust removal of some kind was ... the subject of on-going studies...

Technology Gaps and Additional Trade Studies

Dust abatement/removal technology.

  • Demonstrate high effectiveness (>90% dust clearing) on flexible blanket solar arrays

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190000437/downloads/20190000437.pdf

With regards to ExoMars, a rover bound for Mars (or Moon, as suggested in light of the withdrawal of Russian involvement recently): It was looked at originally, and then in its current configuration they decided that no - it was too risky, and too costly.

With regards to ExoMars, a rover bound for Mars (or Moon, as suggested in light of the withdrawal of Russian involvement recently): It was looked at originally, and then in its current configuration they decided that no - it was too risky, and too costly.

In 2019, dust removal of some kind was still listed as something that needs to be looked at:

Although Compact Telescoping Surface Array for Mars Solar Power was considered as most promising for future Mars solar array technology, dust removal of some kind was ... the subject of on-going studies...

Technology Gaps and Additional Trade Studies

Dust abatement/removal technology.

  • Demonstrate high effectiveness (>90% dust clearing) on flexible blanket solar arrays

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20190000437/downloads/20190000437.pdf

With regards to ExoMars, a rover bound for Mars (or Moon, as suggested in light of the withdrawal of Russian involvement recently): It was looked at originally, and then in its current configuration they decided that no - it was too risky, and too costly.

added 2073 characters in body
Source Link
blobbymcblobby
  • 12.6k
  • 49
  • 72

In short, for past missions NASA has said no, it was not a priority consideration.

In the future, this may change and it is being considered.

In EXPLORING MARS WITH SOLAR-POWERED ROVERS

.. there has been some interest in developing means to mitigate the effect of dust on the solar arrays for long-duration operation on Mars.. however, the engineering decision was that it would be more cost effective to oversize the arrays to account for the predicted degradation than it would be to fly a system to remove dust from the panels.

Since the operating temperature varies significantly during the day, and the spectrum of the incident sunlight varies both with time of day and with the amount of dust in the atmosphere, the performance of the solar arrays on Mars is complicated.

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20060013412/downloads/20060013412.pdf

With the latest Mars-bound rover (explored more below) in its current configuration, they calculated that it would be acceptable to have more than 30% loss in power output by the time the rover reached its end of life due to dust coverage, rather than try and design some kind of dust removal mechanism.

In 2017, NASA did include this provision with the request for concepts in the period 2018-2020:

Mars Surface Solar Array Structures

NASA Space Tech “seedling” study to develop a Mars power architecture with deployable solar arrays

enter image description here

Note requirement number 14: Ability to tilt arrays for dust removal and to feather in high winds.

Unfortunately, no concepts were delivered that satisfied this requirement.

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170004910/downloads/20170004910.pdf

With regards to ExoMars, a rover bound for Mars (or Moon, as suggested in light of the withdrawal of Russian involvement recently): It was looked at originally, and then in its current configuration they decided that no - it was too risky, and too costly.

With the rebirth of the ExoMars mission (not launching before 2028) - they are looking at it again, and then...so this changes to a maybe.

(Note: aka Rosalind Franklin Rover, so @uhoh's question is also here Will the Rosalind Franklin (ExoMars) rover solar panels be able to clear themselves of dust by tilting?)

TL;DR:

In short, originally, no - too risky, too costly.

With the rebirth of the ExoMars mission - they are looking at it again, and then...maybe.

(Note: aka Rosalind Franklin Rover, so @uhoh's question is also here Will the Rosalind Franklin (ExoMars) rover solar panels be able to clear themselves of dust by tilting?)

TL;DR:

In short, for past missions NASA has said no, it was not a priority consideration.

In the future, this may change and it is being considered.

In EXPLORING MARS WITH SOLAR-POWERED ROVERS

.. there has been some interest in developing means to mitigate the effect of dust on the solar arrays for long-duration operation on Mars.. however, the engineering decision was that it would be more cost effective to oversize the arrays to account for the predicted degradation than it would be to fly a system to remove dust from the panels.

Since the operating temperature varies significantly during the day, and the spectrum of the incident sunlight varies both with time of day and with the amount of dust in the atmosphere, the performance of the solar arrays on Mars is complicated.

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20060013412/downloads/20060013412.pdf

With the latest Mars-bound rover (explored more below) in its current configuration, they calculated that it would be acceptable to have more than 30% loss in power output by the time the rover reached its end of life due to dust coverage, rather than try and design some kind of dust removal mechanism.

In 2017, NASA did include this provision with the request for concepts in the period 2018-2020:

Mars Surface Solar Array Structures

NASA Space Tech “seedling” study to develop a Mars power architecture with deployable solar arrays

enter image description here

Note requirement number 14: Ability to tilt arrays for dust removal and to feather in high winds.

Unfortunately, no concepts were delivered that satisfied this requirement.

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20170004910/downloads/20170004910.pdf

With regards to ExoMars, a rover bound for Mars (or Moon, as suggested in light of the withdrawal of Russian involvement recently): It was looked at originally, and then in its current configuration they decided that no - it was too risky, and too costly.

With the rebirth of the ExoMars mission (not launching before 2028) - they are looking at it again, so this changes to a maybe.

(Note: aka Rosalind Franklin Rover, so @uhoh's question is also here Will the Rosalind Franklin (ExoMars) rover solar panels be able to clear themselves of dust by tilting?)

added 476 characters in body
Source Link
blobbymcblobby
  • 12.6k
  • 49
  • 72
Loading
Source Link
blobbymcblobby
  • 12.6k
  • 49
  • 72
Loading