Skip to main content
23 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 7 at 1:17 comment added Peter Mortensen Scott Manley had some coverage of the launch (from 05 min 11 secs).
May 7 at 1:16 comment added Peter Mortensen @CGCampbell: It is to make sense of CallMeTom's comment.
May 6 at 15:01 comment added CGCampbell @PeterMortensen There is no doubt that I am questioning the related-ness of that link.
May 5 at 7:52 vote accept Ernis
May 4 at 21:52 comment added Peter Mortensen Related: Can "doubt" sometimes mean "question"?
May 4 at 21:33 review Suggested edits
May 5 at 5:59
May 4 at 19:52 comment added Criggie This nicely illustrates how space has no country borders, and that space really isn't very far away.
May 4 at 17:56 comment added Steve Pemberton @OscarBravo - launches from Cape Canaveral reach orbit long before they get anywhere near Europe. For some perspective Starlink launches towards the southeast don't even make it past the Virgin Islands by the time the second stage engine cuts off. Even more so for a Vandenberg launch. So the OP was correct in their assumption that a Falcon 9 launch cannot be seen from Europe. However on-orbit engine burns including deorbit burns certainly can be seen there. I suppose a case could be made that an on-orbit engine restart for satellite positioning is part of a launch but that gets into semantics.
May 4 at 14:55 answer added Steve Pemberton timeline score: 27
May 4 at 5:59 comment added Oscar Bravo It sounds like you think rockets get into orbit by going up. They don't; they go up a little bit, then go sideways really fast. A rocket taking off from North America is over Europe in something like 20 minutes - it has gone up a few hundred kilometres, but has gone thousands of kilometres sideways. This article explains it really well - what-if.xkcd.com/58
May 3 at 23:25 comment added BowlOfRed Newsweek article of similar phenomenon from earlier launch as it was seen over Norway. newsweek.com/spiral-sky-spacex-rocket-launch-1876397
May 3 at 20:32 comment added Darth Pseudonym @Ernis Can you describe exactly what you were seeing? "like a small galaxy" is a bit confusing -- Andromeda looks like a sort of vague smudge to the naked eye, when it's visible at all, but I don't think that's what you meant.
May 3 at 18:57 history became hot network question
May 3 at 17:59 history edited phil1008 CC BY-SA 4.0
Typos
May 3 at 13:58 comment added Steve Pemberton It looks like sunset in Lithuania is currently around 9 pm. Yesterday's Vandenberg launch was at 18:36 GMT which would be 9:36 pm EEST. You would have to look at ground tracks of the launch to see if the Falcon 9 second stage or its recently released satellites did in fact pass overhead at the time that you saw whatever it is that you saw.
May 3 at 13:52 comment added Steve Pemberton @CallMeTom - assuming they are referring to what an actual galaxy looks like to the naked eye, that sounds like maybe an on-orbit burn. Whether that's what they saw and whether it was Falcon 9 is unknown.
May 3 at 12:31 history edited Ernis CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
May 3 at 12:23 answer added Hobbes timeline score: 10
May 3 at 12:06 history edited Ernis CC BY-SA 4.0
added clarifications: where in europe it was vissible, which side on the sky
May 3 at 11:48 comment added CallMeTom To clarify some doubts, can you provide us with some more information? Roughly where in Europe have you been? (Cape can Vincent will generate another answer than north cape) In which direction have you looked at what time? And maybe describe how you imagine a "small galaxy slowly moving across the sky" looks like?
May 3 at 11:31 history edited Organic Marble
edited tags
S May 3 at 10:54 review First questions
May 3 at 12:01
S May 3 at 10:54 history asked Ernis CC BY-SA 4.0