Timeline for Would a torchship be legal?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2 at 20:10 | comment | added | SafeFastExpressive | It depends upon whether the party considering breaking the treaty regards the UN as a useful entity to keep empowered. Its basically just a debating society that can be replaced at a whim, so eventually it will fall by the wayside. | |
| Oct 31 at 21:49 | comment | added | Johannes Linkels | Even politically it does not make sense. It depends on which country breaks the treaty and which countries are its friends. | |
| Oct 31 at 10:27 | comment | added | Cadence | While legally this is true, politically it is not. There's always value in not being the first one (seen) breaking a treaty, and in appearing trustworthy and upholding your treaty requirements. The first country to station troops on the Moon would probably get away with it, but they'd have a heck of a time convincing anyone to negotiate future space treaties with them. | |
| Oct 31 at 9:33 | history | edited | Dragongeek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 168 characters in body
|
| Oct 31 at 9:00 | history | answered | Dragongeek | CC BY-SA 4.0 |