Timeline for Why is 28 V a common nominal spacecraft bus voltage?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 8, 2015 at 12:22 | comment | added | user | @AdamWuerl Higher voltage, even in a low voltage range, comes with its own problems; that's why ICs have gone from running on 5 V, to 3.3 V, to 1.5 V, to 0.7 V (or so I recall; don't take the exact numbers as gospel, but IC supply voltage has dropped over the years, let alone how vacuum tubes commonly needed a few hundred volts). Voltage conversion isn't perfect, and especially in the vacuum of space, getting rid of waste heat is a big problem. Changing the voltage either way would need some sort of rationale where the benefits outweigh the downsides. | |
Apr 11, 2015 at 7:50 | comment | added | Hobbes | The 24 V is likely derived from the chemistry of lead-acid batteries (2 V per cell), where 12 cells is a reasonable compromise between high-enough voltage and few-enough cells. | |
Apr 11, 2015 at 2:01 | comment | added | Adam Wuerl | That does provide some sourcing behind the claim that spacecraft use 28 V because aviation does. It also provides some rationale as to why 28 V is better than something lower, but it doesn't do much to explain why it’s not higher. Was there a practical upper limit in battery voltage in that time period? | |
Apr 10, 2015 at 17:02 | history | answered | Kleigh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |