Timeline for 2nd stage speed - with respect to what? (SpaceX webcast of Orbcomm OG2 deployment)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 7, 2021 at 0:14 | history | edited | uhoh |
edited tags
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://space.stackexchange.com/ with https://space.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Dec 29, 2015 at 6:15 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/681720230368903168 | ||
Dec 27, 2015 at 14:10 | comment | added | uhoh | I adjusted the title again - conciseness over grammar here. | |
Dec 27, 2015 at 14:01 | vote | accept | uhoh | ||
Dec 27, 2015 at 14:00 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
conciseness over grammar - adjusted title back a bit
|
Dec 27, 2015 at 12:39 | history | edited | TildalWave | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
ortography, added a tag
|
Dec 27, 2015 at 11:31 | answer | added | TildalWave | timeline score: 5 | |
Dec 27, 2015 at 8:31 | comment | added | uhoh | I think that's the right idea @SF. I added an ugly little calculation to the question along that line of thought. | |
Dec 27, 2015 at 8:25 | history | edited | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
I added some back-of-the-envelope calculations
|
Dec 27, 2015 at 5:24 | comment | added | PearsonArtPhoto♦ | Maybe speed from the launch point? | |
Dec 27, 2015 at 2:30 | comment | added | SF. | It seems Earth surface is the frame of reference, but it's not just projected as vertical speed is definitely a factor, the display speed growing rapidly at launch. | |
Dec 27, 2015 at 0:53 | history | asked | uhoh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |