Timeline for How did the Lunar Module dock with the rest of Apollo 11 and what is the "CSM"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2022 at 23:31 | comment | added | Russell Borogove | If you're not responsible for the run of downvotes on multiple questions that I've received over the last two days, I retract my implication. As for the other answer, you are more than welcome to constructively set up a natural-light photo demonstrating the phenomenon, and post it as answer. I might even upvote it. I'm more or less retired from investing time in answering questions on the site. | |
| May 22, 2022 at 23:11 | comment | added | No Nonsense | Aha, so I am to understand that you are alluding to your perceived unfairness of me having voted down that other answer of yours that uses flawed setup with artificial lighting. If it is the case, then you are more than welcome to prepare your setup, re-shoot the photo of it illuminated by direct sunlight, and update your post -- then I will be more than happy to retract the downvote. Nota bene, it would be much more clear to me if you stated your objections in a more direct, and less passive manner. Cheers. | |
| May 22, 2022 at 22:49 | comment | added | Russell Borogove | “This particular answer”, lol. | |
| May 22, 2022 at 22:04 | comment | added | No Nonsense | of your response, however, fills me with a bit of optimism and hope. Cheers. | |
| May 22, 2022 at 22:04 | comment | added | No Nonsense | I see that you are getting snarky in the second half of your response. I am puzzled as to why you have chosen going with such a line of rhetoric, considering that I haven't even voted this particular answer down at the first place, and that my original comment was not criticism of your answer but instead criticized poor voting ethics admitted to by another user. I am also not convinced that the supposedly most reputable user advising what would basically amount to targeted downvoting, even if only sarcastically, is a desirable thing. The first part {continues} | |
| May 22, 2022 at 21:19 | comment | added | Russell Borogove | @user47149 Having frequently commented "upvoted for XYZ", I can assure you that it's almost never the sole reason for an upvote. But the good news is you can correct this injustice by downvoting just 370 more of my answers on this site! | |
| May 22, 2022 at 21:14 | comment | added | No Nonsense | All power to you if you wish so. What I do oppose is people voting up just for the fact of images being of Lego. I have nothing against the usage of Lego images itself. | |
| May 22, 2022 at 21:10 | comment | added | Russell Borogove | @user47149 I've been wanting to redo this post with all-Lego images. Getting mighty tempting. | |
| May 22, 2022 at 16:17 | comment | added | No Nonsense | @DylanSp If the reason for you to vote up was indeed the photo of Lego spaceship, then I would strongly suggest visiting the help center and getting familiar with what the purpose of voting is. It is not supposed to be a mechanism similar to FB likes, but one of quality control; frivolous upvoting based on irrelevant and superficial features like photo of Lego model, or photo of a cat, are a misuse that messes up with that quality control system, and your comment is an admission to that. | |
| Apr 25, 2018 at 22:05 | history | edited | Russell Borogove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 272 characters in body
|
| Nov 29, 2017 at 1:47 | history | edited | Russell Borogove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 225 characters in body
|
| Nov 27, 2017 at 18:09 | history | edited | Russell Borogove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 180 characters in body
|
| Nov 27, 2017 at 14:48 | comment | added | DylanSp | Upvoted for the Lego LM/CSM. | |
| Sep 10, 2017 at 20:08 | vote | accept | Rob Truxal | ||
| Sep 10, 2017 at 11:47 | comment | added | Eric Duminil | Here's an explanation for the LM ascent footage : io9.gizmodo.com/… | |
| Sep 10, 2017 at 4:10 | history | edited | Nathan Tuggy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Heavily tweaked markdown
|
| Sep 10, 2017 at 1:53 | history | edited | Russell Borogove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2017 at 1:47 | history | edited | Russell Borogove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2017 at 1:37 | history | edited | Russell Borogove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 175 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2017 at 1:32 | history | edited | Russell Borogove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 175 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2017 at 1:21 | history | edited | Russell Borogove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 194 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2017 at 1:14 | history | edited | Russell Borogove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 108 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2017 at 1:08 | history | answered | Russell Borogove | CC BY-SA 3.0 |