Return to Answer

Added as a (now largely unnecessary) extension to the explanation of the training

Well framed images, such as this one

actually weren't that well framed

a little black border added at the top really helps (thank goodness there are no arials sticking up, eh?) and cutting out that noisy foreground has the double benefit of leaving just a single track of footprints. But let's be honest, a more level horizon would've been much better.

As Kubrick would never have said "We'll fix it in post[production]"

And, of course, for every "reasonably" framed photo, there were some not so reasonable framed ones:

one out of three isn't bad...

come on Neil, if you're going to take a picture of someone leaving a spacecraft to step on the surface, can't you get one with both the door and the point where the "ladder" hits the ground in the same shot?

hopefully, it's no surprise that the image credit for these goes to NASA, and Neil Armstrong. I like this page, because it ties the images into the astronaut activity

Added as a (now largely unnecessary) extension to the explanation of the training

Well framed images, such as this one

actually weren't that well framed

a little black border added at the top really helps (thank goodness there are no antennas sticking up, eh?) and cutting out that noisy foreground has the double benefit of leaving just a single track of footprints. But let's be honest, a more level horizon would've been much better.

As Kubrick would never have said "We'll fix it in post[production]"

And, of course, for every "reasonably" framed photo, there were some not so reasonable framed ones:

one out of three isn't bad...

come on Neil, if you're going to take a picture of someone leaving a spacecraft to step on the surface, can't you get one with both the door and the point where the "ladder" hits the ground in the same shot?

hopefully, it's no surprise that the image credit for these goes to NASA, and Neil Armstrong. I like this page, because it ties the images into the astronaut activity

Well framed images, such as this one

actually weren't that well framed

a little black border added at the top really helps (thank goodness there are no arials sticking up, eh?) and cutting out that noisy foreground has the double benefit of leaving just a single track of footprints. But let's be honest, a more level horizon would've been much better.

As Kubrick would never have said "We'll fix it in post[production]"

And, of course, for every "reasonably" framed photo, there were some not so reasonable framed ones:

one out of three isn't bad...

come on Neil, if you're going to take a picture of someone leaving a spacecraft to step on the surface, can't you get one with both the door and the point where the "ladder" hits the ground in the same shot?

hopefully, it's no surprise that the image credit for these goes to NASA, and Neil Armstrong. I like this page, because it ties the images into the astronaut activity

Added as a (now largely unnecessary) extension to the explanation of the training

Well framed images, such as this one

actually weren't that well framed

a little black border added at the top really helps (thank goodness there are no arials sticking up, eh?) and cutting out that noisy foreground has the double benefit of leaving just a single track of footprints. But let's be honest, a more level horizon would've been much better.

As Kubrick would never have said "We'll fix it in post[production]"

And, of course, for every "reasonably" framed photo, there were some not so reasonable framed ones:

one out of three isn't bad...

come on Neil, if you're going to take a picture of someone leaving a spacecraft to step on the surface, can't you get one with both the door and the point where the "ladder" hits the ground in the same shot?

hopefully, it's no surprise that the image credit for these goes to NASA, and Neil Armstrong. I like this page, because it ties the images into the astronaut activity

Well framed images, such as this one

actually weren't that well framed

a little black border added at the top really helps (thank goodness there are no arials sticking up, eh?) and cutting out that noisy foreground has the double benefit of leaving just a single track of footprints. But let's be honest, a more level horizon would've been much better.

one out of three isn't bad...

come on Neil, if you're going to take a picture of someone leaving a spacecraft to step on the surface, can't you get one with both the door and the point where the "ladder" hits the ground in the same shot?

Well framed images, such as this one

actually weren't that well framed

a little black border added at the top really helps (thank goodness there are no arials sticking up, eh?) and cutting out that noisy foreground has the double benefit of leaving just a single track of footprints. But let's be honest, a more level horizon would've been much better.

As Kubrick would never have said "We'll fix it in post[production]"

And, of course, for every "reasonably" framed photo, there were some not so reasonable framed ones:

one out of three isn't bad...

come on Neil, if you're going to take a picture of someone leaving a spacecraft to step on the surface, can't you get one with both the door and the point where the "ladder" hits the ground in the same shot?

hopefully, it's no surprise that the image credit for these goes to NASA, and Neil Armstrong. I like this page, because it ties the images into the astronaut activity