Skip to main content
Space Exploration

Return to Question

Post Reopened by Harish Chandra Rajpoot, Fred, Glorfindel, Puffin, Star Man
Post Closed as "Not suitable for this site" by Organic Marble, David Hammen, Rory Alsop♦, uhoh, Christopher James Huff
Plausibility isn't on the table. The explanation is the explanation, plausible or not.
Source Link
edit approved Feb 25, 2021 at 21:53
Stian
edit approved Feb 25, 2021 at 21:53
Stian
  • 103
  • 4

Is there a plausiblean explanation for the absence of any sign that would demonstrate the eight retro rockets in the image below were really working? It seems that no gas was getting out of the nozzles.

enter image description here

The sky crane of Perseverance rover with the engines apparently stopped

Is there a plausible explanation for the absence of any sign that would demonstrate the eight retro rockets in the image below were really working? It seems that no gas was getting out of the nozzles.

enter image description here

The sky crane of Perseverance rover with the engines apparently stopped

Is there an explanation for the absence of any sign that would demonstrate the eight retro rockets in the image below were really working? It seems that no gas was getting out of the nozzles.

enter image description here

The sky crane of Perseverance rover with the engines apparently stopped

Became Hot Network Question
Tweeted twitter.com/StackSpaceExp/status/1364183262797651968
Source Link
azot
azot
  • 981
  • 5
  • 16

How did the Perseverance rover land on Mars with the retro rockets apparently stopped?

Is there a plausible explanation for the absence of any sign that would demonstrate the eight retro rockets in the image below were really working? It seems that no gas was getting out of the nozzles.

enter image description here

The sky crane of Perseverance rover with the engines apparently stopped