I've seen many references to "terminal velocity" on reentry, e.g., prior to a Falcon 9 landing burn.
And I'm confused by this.
Because terminal velocity comes from drag which depends closely on air density and drag coefficient.
And air density increases a lot as the rocket descends. And the drag coefficient changes a lot—and very nonlinearly—as the rocket goes from supersonic to subsonic.
(A Falcon 9 is traveling at hundreds of m/s when the final landing burn begins---right in that transonic region where the drag coefficient is highly nonlinear).
So the force balance on the rocket (before ignition) is:
$$ mg - \frac{1}{2} C_\texttt{D}(v) \rho(h) A v^2 = 0, $$
or:
$$ v = \sqrt{\left(\frac{2mg}{C_\texttt{D}(v) \rho(h) A}\right)}, $$
where velocity is not a constant, not even approximately, but a variable changing wildly (and nonlinearly) during descent.
Am I not seeing this right?
A parachuter normally jumps from no more than a mile or two above ground at no more than 150 mph, so changes in air density and drag coefficient are small and you can approximate them as constant---meaning it's OK to talk of terminal velocity there.
But a transonic rocket dropping rapidly and wildly in speed and altitude? At best, you can speak of a variable terminal speed, it seems? And if it's variable, then what meaning does "terminal" have anymore?