9
$\begingroup$

The Spaceflight Now article Rocket Lab test launch halted by ship traffic, deteriorating weather mentions that the recent planned launch of the Electron rocket was cancelled due to a combination of factors, including weather.

Are there any significant differences between launch vehicles in terms of "launchability" in less than ideal weather? Would the Electron, or even smaller sounding rockets require better weather (for example lower wind speed or gradients) than larger rockets? Or vice versa?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ In principle, larger rockets should be less affected by atmospheric issues (more rocket mass per cross-sectional area to soak up whatever the air does to you) but in practice I suspect the safety margins sought are probably independent of the rocket. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jan 21 '18 at 0:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RussellBorogove I'm waiting for someone to point out that there is at least one class of rockets that don't have a schedule, and should work in (almost) all kinds of weather, but here I'm assuming the "postponable" varieties. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 21 '18 at 0:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Those being military ones? $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jan 21 '18 at 0:58
  • $\begingroup$ Oh they probably meant ICBMs, now that you mention it, but my first thought was "Hasn't Soyuz launched in the middle of a blizzard?" $\endgroup$ – ORcoder Mar 6 '18 at 17:16
1
$\begingroup$

Here is one data point. I'm hoping for a better answer by the way, but this is the best I can do:


The SciNews YouTube video Terrier-Black Brant IX sounding rocket launches DXL mission shows a small-ish sounding rocket which put the DXL spacecraft on a sub-orbital trajectory that reached 160 miles or nearly 260 km. Since it doesn't snow very often at Cape Canaveral, I can't say one way or the other if the "big rockets" launched there can also launch in snow, but although I have seen many photos of Russian launches with snow on the ground, I haven't seen any (yet) while it was snowing! Happy to be proven wrong though!

A NASA Terrier-Black Brant IX suborbital sounding rocket launched the Diffuse X-rays from the Local galaxy, or DXL, mission from the Poker Flat Research Range (PFRR) in Alaska, on 19 January 2018. The DXL investigation aims to study the sources of X-rays that hurtle towards Earth from elsewhere in the Milky Way galaxy.

below: A Proton rocket in the snow, but not yet ready to launch. From the Space News article A Proton rocket launched overnight on its first flight in a year.


enter image description here

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

To some extent, smaller rockets require better weather conditions in order to launch. Though, it depends on the instrumentation on the rocket more than the size.


When Apollo 12 launched during a thunderstorm, the Saturn V was hit with several lightning bolts. The Saturn V was built with the ability to launch in virtually every weather condition except the end of the world. It was not necessarily the size of the rocket that mattered, but the resilience. Being a manned rocket, there were basically backups for backups, making the Saturn V extremely resilient to outside forces.

A wind shear is a rocket's worst nightmare. The rocket engineers know the limitations of the rocket and may give a GO for a launch, then during launch, the winds violently change, knocking the rocket off-course.

Agencies prefer calm conditions because it does not strain the rocket's guidance. Given the choice between barely using the stability assist or heavily using the stability assist, the launch specialists will definitely go with barely using the stability assist because if the SAS (stability assist system) were to go haywire, the next blow will send it downwards.

The capability of the SAS is based on the purpose of the rocket. For instance, the Falcon 9 is meant to go to LEO (low earth orbit.) Conditions for low earth orbit reset almost every ninety minutes, giving SpaceX a more flexible launch window. The Saturn V was committing to a moonshot. In order for the Saturn V to launch, NASA had to take the moon phases and the moon's orbit into account. The moon's orbit (a day) and the moon's phase cycle (twenty-seven days) overlapped provide little opportunities to land on the moon, requiring a less flexible launch window. In order for NASA to deal with the constricted launch window, they had to make a rocket that can deal with any instances of harsh weather. Hence, they packed the Saturn V full of instrumentation.

P.S. You can cross-check moon-phase cycles with Apollo launches using this moon phase checker and a list of Apollo launches. You'll find that most launches took place either close to the full moon or first quarter or smack dab in the middle of a full moon.

  • Saturn V Instrumentation Unit
  • "Challenger encountered the first of several high-altitude wind shear conditions, which lasted until about 64 seconds...The wind shear caused the steering system to be more active than on any previous flight." NASA JSC
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your answer would benefit from some references backing up your assertions. It also doesn't really answer the question, other than the unsupported statement in your first sentence. You don't describe any differences between large and small rockets. $\endgroup$ – Organic Marble Mar 8 '18 at 0:20
  • $\begingroup$ My bad if I was making it sounds like a specific circumstance. What I was trying to say was that they would try and make rocket launches be as safe as possible. In order to send a rocket through wind, the SAS will have to compensate for the wind against it. Engineers would go with a rocket launch where SAS does not have to do too much work rather than the SAS taking a heavy load of computing and compensating. Once again, my apologies for making it sound like a specific circumstance. $\endgroup$ – faroukcharkas Mar 8 '18 at 0:22
  • $\begingroup$ @faroukcharkas thanks for taking time to write an answer. It would be really helpful if you could add some supporting links or references to these. A good Stack Exchange answer should be factual, and right now, even though this "sounds reasonable" it's hard for me or future readers to tell if these are true or not. I'd recommend trying to dig up some supporting references or links for at least what you can. See my previous comment ;-) $\endgroup$ – uhoh Mar 8 '18 at 0:42

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.