2
$\begingroup$

Assuming that a defense system is capable of determining an object's flight path angle ($\gamma$), velocity (v), and radius (r), how could one differentiate between an ICBM, a satellite, or a solar probe?

One could begin with the energy equation:

$$\epsilon = \frac {v^2}{2} -\frac{\mu}{r}$$

where $\mu$ is the gravitational parameter $G(M+m)$, and the sign of $\epsilon$ would help to differentiate the objects, since if:

$$\epsilon<0 = closed$$ $$\epsilon \geq 0 = open$$

Thus a negative value would indicate a closed orbit, meaning that the object is either an ICBM or satellite, while a positive value would indicate an open orbit, meaning that the object is a solar probe.

However, in cases where $\epsilon$ is negative, how could one use the flight path angle to differentiate between the two options?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ By solar probe, you mean something in heliocentric orbit, not something investigating the sun, right? $\endgroup$ – Camille Goudeseune Jan 19 at 23:24
  • $\begingroup$ @CamilleGoudeseune I refer to an object on a parabolic or hyperbolic orbit relative to Earth $\endgroup$ – Essan Verne Jan 20 at 2:47
  • $\begingroup$ no, but you can determine the nature of it's current trajectory $\endgroup$ – JCRM Jan 21 at 8:58
3
$\begingroup$

Given the radial distance $r$, velocity $v$, flight path angle $\gamma$ in radians, gravitational parameter $\mu$, and specific orbital energy $\epsilon$,

the specific relative angular momentum is

$$h= \|{\overrightarrow{r} \times \overrightarrow{v}}\| = rv\sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2}+ \gamma\right) =rv\cos\left( \gamma\right)$$

Then the orbital eccentricity is

$$e=\sqrt{1+\frac{2\epsilon h^2}{\mu^2}}$$

and the semimajor axis is

$$a = -\frac{\mu}{2\epsilon}$$

That yields the periapsis distance $q = a(1-e)$.

If $q$ is less than the radius of the planet being orbited, the object is on a suborbital path, and given the constraints of objects in the original question, would be an ICBM.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ And yet a satellite falling out of orbit might be indistinguishable from a high-altitude ballistic missile. I agree with your math but think the question is a bit vague. $\endgroup$ – Carl Witthoft Jan 20 at 12:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A ballistic missile will have been detected at launch. The US, Russia, and I assume many other countries all have extensive launch detection systems. The US systems are so good they detected the surface-to-air missile that shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 in 2014. If you backtrack the object's path, an ICBM will have a launch event at its beginning, a falling satellite will not. $\endgroup$ – Ryan_L Jan 20 at 19:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.