14
$\begingroup$

In 2010 a Sabatier system was added to the Regenerative ECLSS part of the US side of the International Space Station. This system created usable water from hydrogen and carbon dioxide waste gases.

A 2018 presentation about the Robotic External Leak Locator states that the Sabatier was removed from the ISS in 2017.

What happened, why didn't it work out?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
7
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Rats, that would have been really useful to get in space experience with. $\endgroup$
    – geoffc
    Commented May 21, 2020 at 12:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ IIRC, it kept shutting itself off. Parts failed, were replaced, and failed again. It was one of many failed experiments that NASA deemed to be a success but never used again, like tethers. $\endgroup$
    – David Hammen
    Commented May 21, 2020 at 13:33
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ From a 2019 conference paper titled International Space Station as a Development Testbed for Advanced Environmental Control and Life Support Systems, emphasis mine, "The Sabatier Reactor Assembly (SRA) that was operating on ISS will be upgraded and returned to the ISS for continued operation. The unit was returned to the ground for evaluation in 2017." I however can't find any indication that it has been / will be upgraded and returned to the ISS. $\endgroup$
    – David Hammen
    Commented May 21, 2020 at 14:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @DavidHammen the annual "Status of ISS Water Recovery and Management" papers available on ntrs give some insight (including a statement that a new unit is planned) but details are still sketchy. $\endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Commented May 21, 2020 at 14:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I don't have any insight into the Sabatier reactor, but I know that CDRA was giving them utter fits a couple years ago. I don't know what process that particular piece of hardware used. $\endgroup$
    – Tristan
    Commented May 21, 2020 at 16:27

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
10
$\begingroup$

Figure 4. Timeline of Recent OGA Events enter image description here The timeline say the Sabatier was removed and returned at 11/28/2017 for TT&E.

2019 - Advanced Oxygen Generation Assembly for Exploration Missions - Kevin Takada et al source

This below is what I was able to find, with more detailed information.

The performance of the Sabatier reactor degraded over the last several years and was removed from service in October 2017 and returned to ground for a failure investigation. The ISS Program Office is currently planning to build another Sabatier reactor for operation on ISS in 2020. source

11/28/2017 Crew Removing the Sabatier unit from the Oxygen Generation System (OGS) Rack. From on-orbit report

01/27/2017 Sabatier Restart: Last month, the Sabatier system could not be restarted after being in Standby for an extended period of time. During the attempted restarts, the system showed little to no reaction occurring in the reactor and no water being produced. Yesterday, ground teams executed a procedure to warm up the reactor prior to a restart attempt and successfully restarted the Sabatier. The team believes that the higher temperature and additional duration of the heat soak allowed the reaction to kick off. Water continued to be produced overnight. From on-orbit report

Another failure reported, from 2013: (...)The original failure was due to delta pressure fault detected at the inlet to the reactor assembly. The second attempt was unsuccessful when liquid water was detected on both liquid sensors on the Sabatier vent line. After allowing the liquid sensors to dry out, the ground performed a third attempt which was successful. Sabatier was operational overnight before faulting out and shutting down once again. This last shutdown was due to another delta pressure fault. The fault signatures are indicative of moisture in the CO2 accumulator which is partially blocking flow. Sabatier team is concerned with moisture being received from Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA) or condensation that has accumulated in the CO2 accumulator tanks. on-orbit report

I didn't get more details about the failures. It is interesting that the link you used in your question says at the end "Last updated: 7 August 2017". But it seems that it was not, because even the return to TT&E the link/text does not mention. Just 2 months before, they could to add it info.

More info about the subject: A Sabatier reaction based CO2 Reduction Assembly (CRA) is a hardware that interfaces with the Oxygen Generation Assembly (OGA) and Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA), using the Carbon dioxide available from CDRA and the hydrogen that is available from OGA water electrolysisis. When CRA is activated it produces methane and water via the Sabatier reaction CO2 + 4H2 <-> CH4 + 2H2O source

All of that components are part of the ISS Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS)

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Can you expand a little bit on the relation between the OGA and the Sabatier for those who might not know? And I'd like some specifics on what was wrong with the Sabatier. If the info is in those links, best to summarize them in the answer. As written, this says when, but not why. $\endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Commented May 21, 2020 at 17:25
  • $\begingroup$ yes, sure, I can elaborate this better. Anyway, about the relation between OGA and Sabatier is at your answer in that Q: "How close is the ISS to a closed system, in terms of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen?" $\endgroup$
    – Apaiss
    Commented May 21, 2020 at 17:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yeah, I know, but the answer is not just for me. $\endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Commented May 21, 2020 at 20:53
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Edit greatly improves the answer, thanks! I usually wait a day or so before accepting. $\endgroup$
    – Organic Marble
    Commented May 22, 2020 at 1:07
-3
$\begingroup$

It’s a miniature refinery. The catalyst poisons easily from CDRA dust and condensate in the feed gases.

Assurance of feed gas purity is a key ingredient they assume but don’t measure.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not one of the downvoters or delete-voters; can you expound on CDRA dust? Given the context of the answer from 4 years ago, CDRA would seem to be "Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly"? Maybe provide a source for your assertions? $\endgroup$
    – Erin Anne
    Commented Sep 25 at 22:30
  • $\begingroup$ Can you explain where you got this information (not necessarily with a public link if one isn't available)? Are you in any way related to the program? Is this first-hand information or just your own guess? This sounds like a potentially very valuable answer and it would be a shame for it to get downvoted to oblivion. $\endgroup$
    – TooTea
    Commented Sep 27 at 9:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.