18
$\begingroup$

The Moon's distance can be as much as about 406,000 km from Earth. That's a round trip light time of roughly 2 x 406,000 / 300,000 = 2.7 seconds or more, depending on how the signal was relayed to mission control, plus any response time.

When the ascent module launched and accelerated vertically, how (the heck) did NASA get the video camera on the Moon to track it correctly several seconds in the future? Were clocks on the Moon and on the ground synchronized, or were they just anticipating based on verbal countdowns from the astronauts perhaps?

Or maybe they recruited Marvin the Martian to do the camera work?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Looking at the first video, the camera only starts panning upwards 2-3 seconds after liftoff. So it seems plausible to me that the operator only sent the command to start panning at liftoff, or just a little before. And it's not like they didn't have a nice countdown leading up to it. In general, the tracking really doesn't seem all that accurate; the ascent module barely stays within the frame. I suspect that, with a bit of simulated practice, it wouldn't be hard to manage that level of accuracy even with a 2.7 second delay. $\endgroup$ – Ilmari Karonen Jan 1 at 0:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ OK, I'm going to stay hands of on this one though. (I've muddied things enough already, I think) $\endgroup$ – Alex Hajnal Jan 1 at 1:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AlexHajnal Stack Exchange is a strange animal and takes a while to get used to (I'm still not used to it). That's why my user profile says something like "Let Stack Exchange be Stack Exchange" ;-) In this case, the main idea is to get the most eyes to the best answers more than judging the details of the questions. update: However, I've just added "considering the substantial delay" to the title based on your concerns. Like (at)Hobbes says, SE is a collaboration. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 1 at 1:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @uhoh No, and your T-shirt is fine! I actually saw that it was your post after editing and wondered to myself if I just stepped on toes much bigger than mine. I love your questions as much as I love your answers! $\endgroup$ – dotancohen Jan 1 at 9:26
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @dotancohen it's hard to step on my toes as they are usually elsewhere and it was a correct and inevitable edit. $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 1 at 9:30
37
$\begingroup$

A controller on Earth, Ed Fendell, manually operated the camera by radio control, knowing the time of liftoff and the ascent trajectory expected and referring to a time-and-angle chart without watching the video feed in real time! According to Fendell:

Now, the way that worked was this. Harley Weyer, who worked for me, sat down and figured what the trajectory would be and where the lunar rover would be each second as it moved out, and what your settings would go to. That picture you see was taken without looking at it [the liftoff] at all. There was no watching it and doing anything with that picture. As the crew counted down, that's a [Apollo] 17 picture you see, as [Eugene] Cernan counted down and he knew he had to park in the right place because I was going to kill him, he didn't — and Gene and I are good friends, he'll tell you that — I actually sent the first command at liftoff minus three seconds. And each command was scripted, and all I was doing was looking at a clock, sending commands. I was not looking at the television. I really didn't see it until it was over with and played back. Those were just pre-set commands that were just punched out via time. That's the way it was followed.

The camera was mounted on the Lunar Roving Vehicle and was used during the EVAs to look at interesting things here and there -- essentially a third set of eyes in the field!

The LRV and its remote-controlled camera was flown on the last three Apollo missions, and only the third really got a satisfactory video of the ascent.

No attempt was made to track the ascent on Apollo 15 due to a mechanical problem with the camera.

On Apollo 16, it was difficult to pan fast enough to catch the ascent because the LRV was parked closer to the LM than on 17.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Wow. And here I assumed automation via local radar. Overestimating early 1970s technology apparently... $\endgroup$ – T.J. Crowder Jan 1 at 17:26
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @T.J.Crowder I imagine the technology would have been available (radar guided missile systems maturing through the '60s), but not the weight and power budget on the LRV for a radar system. $\endgroup$ – Russell Borogove Jan 1 at 17:53
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah, exactly. :-) $\endgroup$ – T.J. Crowder Jan 1 at 17:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Ah the 70s. When people could chew gum and pan cameras without looking at the capture screen. Lost skills. $\endgroup$ – David Tonhofer Jan 2 at 10:47

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.